Why is this weblog important?


The command to love one another as Christ loves us is more than a magnificent "ideal." It is not one among other commands. It is the very heart of "the word," the command, given by God the Logos, Jesus Christ, to each believer. continue to the signature video and essay for the missionary vision and goals of this site>>

Wednesday, October 8, 2008

Desire - a 4 minute duet of sublime theatre


SUBLIME THEATRE





DESIRE

a 4 minute duet of sublime theatre





__ A presentation by ~gonzodave for BluRose Productions __

('Sublime Theatre' and 'Desire - a 4 minute duet of sublime theatre' copyright 2008 by ~gonzodave. All conceptual and publishing rights reserved for original material at http://www.bluroseproductions.blogspot.com)



SOUR DREAMS

Featured poem by ~zion

(copyrighted material used wih permission)








Thank you for your interest.

Please enter and step to your right.






















Best view is in 600 x 800. To start the viewing, please click the arrow (--->) for continuous loop and start one or both the players. Then continue down.


































Please watch your step.























The viewing will start in a moment.



































My soul







the crash test dummy of








My deeds

















My face








the clown painted need of









His grace
















My self









the sense and bone flesh of










Desire






Test Test 1-2-3 by ~gonzodave













A cauldron of unholy loves bubbled up all around

me. I loved not as yet, yet I loved to love; and

with a hidden want, I abhorred myself that I

wanted not.












I searched about for something to love, in love

and loving, and hating security, and a way not

beset with snares. For within me I had a dearth of

that inward food, Thyself, my God, though that

dearth caused me no hunger; but I remained

without all desire for incorruptible food, not

because I was already filled thereby, but the more

empty I was the more I loathed it.













For this reason my soul was far from well, and, full

of ulcers, it miserably cast itself forth, craving to

be excited by contact with objects of sense. Yet,

had these no soul, they would not surely inspire

love.











To love and to be loved was sweet to me, and all

the more when I succeeded in enjoying the person

I loved. I befouled, therefore, the spring of

friendship with the filth of concupiscence, and I

dimmed its lustre with the hell of lustfulness; and

yet, foul and dishonourable as I was, I craved,

through an excess of vanity, to be thought

elegant and urbane.











I fell precipitately, then, into the love in which I

longed to be ensnared. My God, my mercy, with

how much bitterness didst Thou, out of Thy infinite

goodness, besprinkle for me that sweetness! For I

was both beloved, and secretly arrived at the bond

of enjoying; and was joyfully bound with trouble-

some ties, that I might be scourged with the

burning iron rods of jealousy, suspicion, fear,

anger, and strife.









Confessions, Augustine










































SHANNON. That night, when I went to my room. I found that I had a roomate.

MAXINE. The Texas canary had moved in with you?

SHANNON. No, the spook had moved in with me -

MAXINE. Hah! The spook! (she rises stands at the drink cart.)

SHANNON. And he's been on my tail ever since. He's followed me up this hill, he's creeping and crawling around here in the rain-forest now.

MAXINE. Is he scared to come on the verandah?

SHANNON. He gets up his nerve after sun-down. I haven't slept in three nights.

MAXINE. You'll sleep tonite, Baby. Leave that to me. I'll keep that spook off your back.










The Night of the Iguana, Tennessee Williams






















Restless nights of insomnia madness




















Sour dreams of infinite sexual fantasies




















Insatiable beasts that need constant feeding




















Spreading wings to feel the wetness of the falls




















Crossing dark tight paths of insane pleasures




















Beast against beast scavenging for more




















Drops of sweat traveling down their erect bodies




















Feeling like they own the world with every move




















Burning hands playing in forbidden grounds




















Discovering mysterious walls of smoke




















Of crossing flames intoxicated by lust




















Arching backs while being held down with fury




















Completely lost in a labyrinth of orgasms




















Like trapped reptiles running inside their skin




















Looking for a way out to release their inner




















passion




















To finally find tranquility in the arms of another




















beast





Sour Dreams by ~zion


























the

end




A BluRose Production


produced by ~gonzodave






SOUR DREAMS


by ~zion


http://www.webook.com/member/zion





TEST TEST 1-2-3


by ~gonzodave


http://www.webook.com/member/gonzodave

















Credits


1. Photos courtesy of FlickR

2. 'Adagio for Strings' Samuel Barber - reduced quality public domain sound bite

3. URL feed for MP3 - mine



* Sour Dreams copyright 2008 by zion. Used with permission and reprinted here in it's entirety. Visit zion and her work 'Sour Dreams' at:

http://www.webook.com/shortstory.aspx?p=4f2f3d336cfe4c0ea8c2ec9d1d438164&sit=42f1ea4ff2b6447d9a8d536f02a6ff7e


Tuesday, July 1, 2008

"The Gonzo Journalism of Grace" Preview for Books 1-3

Dear Reader,

Here is a link to a preview of my completed, but not the final edit of Books 1-3 titled The Gonzo Journalism of Grace. I will have a personalized digital copy available soon for a small contribution. For now, there is a PayPal button if you would like to make a secure donation in any amount.

I hope you benefit from reading this vital Christian information. Also, you can join in and help, as all comments will be used to 'complete' the final edit. Your thoughts and comments may be emailed to gonzodave@koinoniaofgrace.com.

The Gonzo Journalism of Grace: Book 1 - The Paradox of Law and Grace








The Gonzo Journalism of Grace: Book 2 - Glorious Grace


The Gonzo Journalism of Grace: Book 3 - The Tribunal



My kind regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave

____________


Creative Commons License
"God Save Me From Your Followers! or, the gonzo journalism of grace" by David Coulon is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Based on a work at www.koinioniaofgrace.com. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://www.koinoniaofgrace.com
.
___________

Tuesday, June 24, 2008

She That Is Spiritual



She That Is Spiritual

gonzodave






Mtw 11:6 And blessed is he who takes no offense at Me and finds no cause for stumbling in or through Me and is not hindered from seeing the Truth. AMP

Lk 21:14-15 Therefore be resolved not to rehearse ahead of time how to make your defense. For I (Myself) will give the words (a mouth) along with the wisdom that none of your adversaries will be able to withstand or contradict. NET

Eph 6:16 Pray for me also, that I may be given the message when I begin to speak - that I may confidently make known the mystery of the gospel (good news). NET

"Of indwelling sin, Owen wrote: ‘its nature and formal design is to oppose God; God as a lawgiver, God as holy, God as the author of the gospel, a way of salvation by grace and not by works, are the direct object of the law of sin.’16 Ungodliness, unrighteousness, unbelief and heresy are its natural forms of self-expression. It pervades and pollutes the whole man: ‘it adheres as a depraved principle unto our minds, in darkness and vanity; unto our affections in sensuality; unto our wills, in a loathing of, and aversion from, that which is good; and ... continually putting itself upon us, in inclinations, motions, or suggestions, to evil.’17 And, as we shall see, it resists the whole work of grace, from first to last: ‘when Christ comes with his spiritual power upon the soul to conquer it to himself, he hath no quiet landing place. He can set foot on no ground but what he must fight for.’18"

The Spirituality of John Owen, J. I. Packer




Dear Reader,

What is the informed sharing of God's graceful salvation? I'll attempt a statement. Knowing beforehand, that no condensed iteration will encompass all of the vast understandings that are contained in God's grace. Christianity is the living imputation and monergism (not a partnership with God, but the permanent indwelling power of the Holy Spirit given to regenerate men accomplishes God's work on earth). God's work is accomplished through and in Christ by His resurrection, not a synergism (partnership) and example of Christ in His redemptive death. His death was the past work of Christ, the foundation, not to be repeated, for the present work of the gospel of God's saving grace. The Greek "anothen," in John 3 means both born-again and from-above. This birth is from death to life.

The Apostle Paul was given this gospel of grace as the first of two revelations. The second being the mystery of the Body of Christ for the power of daily living in faith - after salvation and regeneration. Justification by faith is the core doctrine of the gospel of grace for salvation that brings one into the covenant of grace. Whereas, sanctification that leads to an end purpose of communion with God is the core teaching of the covenant of grace. "The chief aim of man is to glorify God and to enjoy Him." Many have taught and died sharing God's saving grace in the first revelation of the gospel - the Cross. The second was not rediscovered by Luther. Calvin and the Puritans were the standard bearers of the covenant of grace - the Spirit.

The Cross and the Spirit. The world died, the raven left; but the dove returned to Noah with a living branch. New beginnings.

In summary, the sovereignty of God in all things, combined with man's free choice in a saving belief that God's Promise is true - when recognized by God in a single moment - guarantees an assured salvation. And, from that moment forward, the power of the Spirit of Christ guarantees future transformation, good works, and the spiritual joy of communion (1 John 3:23). The Cross gives merit to the sinner through Christ in which the Spirit has righteous ground to transform the sinning believer into the image of the Son of God by the works of grace. This is the purpose of salvation by the graceful works of God.

Finally - keep forever in mind - salvation from the penalty of sin was accomplished first by Christ for "whomsoever" shall believe that He died for them. Secondly, salvation is accomplished from the power of sin by the willing saint's reliance on the power of the permanent indwelling of the Holy Spirit of God. And lastly, the saint's salvation from the possession of sin will be finally accomplished in his bodily death and the death of the old sin nature that comes with natural birth. Death to life everlasting and release from the power of the world organized by Satan, the flesh with its inborn sin nature, and the devil himself (John 16:7-11).

Why then would God's Truth in His grace not be one among many counterfeits? What is the distinguishing mark? A consensus of opinion? Scripture tells us no man needs another to teach him God's Truth. Without the inner witness of the Holy Spirit for confirmation Truth may not be discerned. For this reason, many unregenerate professing Christians are rationally convinced of a truth. A truth they do not personally possess. Read about the life and works of John Owen for a life that exemplified "he that is spiritual."


" Again, Owen knew the power of his gospel. Preachers, he held, must have ‘experience of the power of the truth which they preach in and upon their own souls. . . . man preacheth that sermon only well unto others which preacheth itself in his own soul.’6 Therefore he made this rule: "I hold myself bound in conscience and in honour, not even to imagine that I have attained a proper knowledge of any one article of truth, much less to publish it, unless through the Holy Spirit I have had such a taste of it, in its spiritual sense, that I may be able, from the heart, to say with the psalmist, ‘I have believed, and therefore have I spoken.

... Affection may be the helm of the ship, but the mind must steer; and the chart to steer by is God’s revealed truth. Consequently, it is the preacher’s first task to teach his flock the doctrines of the Bible, eschewing emotionalism (the attempt to play directly on the affections) and addressing himself constantly to the mind. Owen habitually spoke of himself as a teacher, and conducted his own ministry on these principles, as his published sermons and practical treaties show.

... Fourth, the Christian is a regenerate man, a new creature in Christ. A new principle of life, and habit of obedience, has been implanted in him. This is the prophesied ‘circumcision of the heart’. ‘Whereas the blindness, obstinacy, and stubbornness in sin, that is in us by nature, with the prejudices which possess our minds and affections, hinder us from conversion unto God, by this circumcision they are taken away’, 21 and man’s first act of true, saving faith in Jesus Christ, his conscious ‘conversion’, is its immediate result. This act, though directly caused by the Spirit’s regenerative operation in the depths of his being, is perfectly free (i.e., deliberate): ‘in order of nature, the acting of grace in the will in our conversion is antecedent unto its own acting; though in the same instant of time wherein the will is moved, it moves; and when it is acted, it acts itself, and preserves its own liberty in its exercise.’" (Pp 3, 5, 6)



Below is a short biographical work on John Owen, whom Charles Spurgeon named the prince of divines, written by the well-known J. I. Packer. You can click on the top far-right button for a full screen window. The iPaper button at the top-left of the embedded screen allows you to select a view in the 'book mode.' Additionally, you can email-print-download by selecting the iPaper button.

As this article concerns the theme of sanctification and spiritual growth by separation from the world, I caution against "just anyone" casually surfing the Scribd.com and the Deviantart.com websites credited here in this article. They are "the world." Yes, they contain Christian material. But, neither are a family-safe Christian site.

My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave






Carbon Neutral Digital Edition

Credits:

______________

For further reading: He That Is Spiritual - A Classic Study of the Biblical Doctrine of Spirituality, by Lewis Sperry Chafer, D. D., LITT. D. Former President of Dallas Theological Seminary. Former Professor of Systematic Theology. Former Editor of Bibliotheca Sacra. Copyright 1918. Revised edition copyright 1967 by Zondervan. ISBN 0-310-22341-5
______________

Photo used in title image: Copyright 2007-2008~neonka
http://neonka.deviantart.com/art/eye-2-60420711
______________

Photo used to depict Cross and Spirit:
http://saviourmachine.deviantart.com/art/The-cross-of-Christ-85070495
______________

Photo used as accent in quotation block:
angel 'la celeste by ~frame2fame on deviantART
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 3.0 License.



Creative Commons License
"She That Is Spiritual" by David Coulon is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Based on a work at www.koinoniaofgrace.com.

________________________________

Sunday, June 22, 2008

Life In God's Grace




gonzodave




Life in God's Grace

video

Wednesday, June 18, 2008

"Raging River Intellect: My Letter to God" by L Cruz III

Dear reader,

Please enjoy and meditate upon the sonnet-like verses penned by the Christian writer and poet, L Cruz III. The quatrain cry of "My wasted senses - Nothing saw - My broken reason - Worthless straw" has its equal in the black rose of the great Bard. It is the precursor of the Christian claim that "Faith has made reason my friend."

My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave

__________________________________________

Raging River Intellect: My Letter to God



by L Cruz


Your puzzling lures and dizzying ways,

Inspired my eyes to see your face.

But, You blinded me with mortal craves

For a raging River Intellect!


Your puzzling lures and dizzying ways

Lit my urge to hear ablaze,

But, You changed me to a deafened slave

Of a raging River Intellect!


You enticed me to philosophize;

To learn the printed maze,

To share with men the whats and whys...

...Illuminate our ways.


You taught me that to think is good;

'Cause truth distorts through fallen eyes.


I shared this news, just as I should;

You started this! We both agree!


Why then won't You let me see

The Splendor of Your eyes?


My wasted senses.

Nothing saw.

My broken reason;

Worthless straw.


If I don't calm this logic down,

This painted me, a humbled clown,

I do so fear that I will drown,

In this raging River Intellect.


So, I turn a dial 'till music plays.

A piano piece with calming ways,

Its gushing truth fills me with peace.

How glorified this sweet release.


(then) A lump of shock forms in my throat...


NO "MEANING" LIVES IN ANY NOTE!


So, I close my eyes,

And to my surprise

I hear

The

Sweetest

Fragrance

Of Your mighty glow against my

Watching

Touch.


Such sweet mystery to my senses!


You were with me all along.

My strengthened reason proves this true.


A song is nothing but a sign

That points beyond itself to You.


Though intellect can show You're real,

Only You can prove it.


But even proof won't budge a heart

'Till faith and reason move it.


May You baptize us all

In the raging River Intellect!


Amen!

_________________________________

L Cruz III is a fan of Christian philosophy and apologetics. Much more of his work can be found at www.ExploringChrist.com.

Cruz is a husband, a father, a military veteran, a former musical composer for television and for the past 13 years he has been a professional within the television industry.

Article Source: FaithWriters.com http://www.faithwriters.com and FaithReaders.com http://www.faithreaders.com
_____________________

Monday, June 16, 2008

Gonzo Grace


by gonzodave




"So, now, whenever anybody says to me, "Your view of the atonement, you know, is very old-fashioned, the doctrine of substitution is quite out of date;" I am not at all shaken in my belief.

The gentlemen of the modern-thought school, who have been to Germany for their theology, do not like that glorious doctrine of substitution. They think that the atonement is a something or other, that in some way or other, somehow or other, has something or other to do with the salvation of men; but I tell them that their cloudy gospel might have surrounded me till my hair grew grey, but I should never have been any the better for it. I should never have found peace with God, nor come to love the Lord at all, if it had not been that I distinctly saw that he, who knew no sin, was made sin for me, that I might be made the righteousness of God in him.


When I realized that, although I had gone astray from God, and broken his righteous law, he had laid on Christ my iniquity, and punished him in my stead, my soul found rest at once; and, to this day, it cannot rest under any other explanation of the atonement of Christ. So I bear my own personal witness, and many of you can heartily join with me in bearing similar testimony. You have been with Christ, so you can speak of the power of his substitutionary sacrifice as begetting peace in your soul."


Charles H. Spurgeon

1880

"Objective journalism is one of the main reasons American politics has been allowed to be so corrupt for so long. You can't be objective about Nixon."

Hunter S. Thompson

There is no OLD SCHOOL - there is only ONE SCHOOL - which teaches that only two kinds of Catholic, Methodist, Baptist, et. al. exist within any so-called denomination today. Those who trust completely in the substitutionary sacrifice of Christ for continued salvation and those who trust in themselves - just like the rest of the world (e.g., no palengenesis; no regeneration; no new birth from death to life).


It is impossible to be objective about one's own salvation. Objective Christianity is the reason for the latitude that allows for the corrupted message that proudly teaches a loss of salvation for those who are not "good enough" to be accepted by God. The objective is to defend and proclaim God's free grace secured in the blood of Christ Jesus for sinners.


gonzodave




Dear Reader,

(Essay from an unpublished manuscript. About 2800 words)

THE HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL PREMISE OF AMERICAN CHRISTIANITY

What has been gained by the enthusiastic focus on the Christian family, concerning matters that are psychological, behavioral, and legal, when all the while, inside the church there is no difference in the rate of divorce and unwed or unwanted pregnancies? Divorce, pregnancy, and abortion may be said to be completely voluntary in more than 99 of 100 incidents. Also, there is an extreme overemphasis by many so-called Christian organizations against secular attacks upon Christianity. The presumption being that current legal activities to defend religious freedoms maintain the greater democratic freedoms that were founded by men who believed in Jesus Christ for salvation. Keeping in mind the just previous section of HISTORICAL AND CULTURAL FACTS, is this assertion accurate?

In 21st century American society it is rather difficult to distinguish Christianity from the historical beginnings of political thought that began in the post-Reformation and Protestant led English Civil War which continued in the humanism of the politics that were championed in the "Age of Reason/Enlightenment." Christianity has been joined to political thought and used by atheist and deist (e.g., Freemasonry 1) to extend their influence and control. The great contributors to American political thought, John Locke and Thomas Paine, were English Deists and certainly not Christians. John Hancock, for one, and others who signed the Declaration of Independence were Freemasons. Also, George Washington appears in a famous painting sporting full Freemason regalia and the famous Freemason "apron."

Beyond the era of the founding fathers, the Freemason William Taft, the US President between Teddy Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson, was a professed Unitarian. Both recent Presidents named Bush are members of the freemasonry "Skull and Bones Club." Which is an ivy-league fraternity. "In God is our trust" is one line in the Star Spangled Banner. "In God We Trust" was not mandatory on all US currency until 1955. This motto was not originally a national movement. It first appeared on a few Union coins in 1864 - during the War Between the States.

Fierce individualism is a tenet of an unencumbered free economy conceived in the Enlightenment era and is not a NT Christian nor a OT Jewish ethic. Freedom and liberty from the power and penalties of sin contained in the gospel of saving grace does not translate into the "pursuit of happiness" coined by Jefferson (or "property" as originally penned by John Locke). If the OT Jews desired their non-voting theocracy under God so much, why were they constantly being defeated, enslaved, and dispersed as a result of their non-observance of the Sacred Scriptures?

All this is not to say that God and morality were not held in high regard in early colonial America. A little appreciated fact is that a much different "populist" Christianity existed in Colonial America than that which has dominated Protestantism since the 1850's. This dissimilarity is above and beyond any moral considerations. A sovereign grace Puritan of the 1700's is not the free will Arminian of 2008. The "New Light and Old Light" Christian of the "First Great Awakening" is not the Arminian Christian of the "Second Great Awakening." The distinction, once again, is not morality, or rules for living; rather, it is the doctrine of salvation (Soteriology). The vital foundation of the evangel of "good news." Which is "the gospel" message for the lost.

The core difference being what is believed about the value of the death of Christ for salvation. Did Christ pay the full price or not? This was the essential difference of "justification by faith" between Luther and the Roman Church in the Protestant Reformation. This difference continually returns and makes its home inside Christianity. Cults are not in view in this discussion. However, the so-called orthodox Christian salvation - in which cults share the same Soteriology of "parolee" salvation is in view.

In the blood of Christ, denominational distinctions disappear and contain no vital difference. The death of Christ is either considered the single focus, or, it is merely adapted to "rules of life," that consist of so-called biblical Christian commands for continued salvation. The two are not separate "opinions;" rather, one is false and one is true. They cannot occupy the same space. Christ did not die two separate deaths. So, then, historically, American Christianity is properly packaged and separated into apple barrels and orange crates. The distinction of probationary salvation and its traditional form of overly stressed dramatic preaching about hell-fire exists today in the vast populist presence of Arminianism that was spread throughout the early frontier America (1810-1850) by stump-jumping, turn or burn circuit riders who were farmer preachers performing for their evening meal and traveling money (viz., the non-intellectual rural nature of American "populist" Christianity).

Much of the present-day social contention over Christian freedoms would be eliminated and disappear if transferred to the common area of civil freedoms. But, only if the underlying Holy Grail of a tax-exempt status were voluntarily relinquished. "Give unto Caesar what is Caesar's" is not an anti-Christian idea, it is the plain teaching of Jesus and the NT Apostles in many verses of the Epistles. Should this occur, the ACLU would then have no privileged adversary and, thus, no socially offended underdogs that can be elevated to the status of a "specially protected citizen." Also, there would be no "cash cow" for judgment awards to fund their extortive activities.

More importantly, what kind of Christianity is being paraded through the courts of America? Does God really bless America because of the unique worthiness of today's "populist" American Christianity? The character of Christianity that threatens her enemies in the modern secular world is quite a different hazard than that which jeopardized the 1st century secular enemies of the church. Aside from His blasting condemnation of the spiritual sin of the Pharisees, Jesus did not condemn sinners for being immoral. He cleansed the temple of spiritual sin and "thieves" who were "money changers." Also, Jesus allowed demons that He had exorcised to destroy 2000 income producing pigs that were illegally owned by Jews. The villagers promptly ran Him out of town. The Apostles, who were poor as dirt themselves, took away income also. They did this by silencing a persistent slave girl who was a fortune teller and converting people to Christianity. The well-to-do owners of the demon-possessed slave girl lost their livelihood and the conversions threatened the powerful metalsmith union that produced idols and depleted the local Jewish synagogues of tithe paying Jews. (The continued practice of Judaism for acceptance before God became spiritual sin after the death of Christ.) The Ephesian believers burned 50,000 man-days (almost 200 man-years) worth of "books of magic and spells" several years after their conversion. All of the above mentioned financially injured and non-believing parties sought legal retribution. The common thread is monetary loss of income earned by "spiritual" sin against God in the form of denying Jesus Christ, not moral sin.

The epistolary NT gives explicit details to determine a false teacher by their doctrine, not their morality. The first three Gospels, with advice intended primarily for a future time, state just the opposite. The greatest "spiritual" sin committed today is by those who enjoy a fabulous life-style from preaching a false Christianity. The "poor little donkey," the teachings defended by the NT writers against the internal enemies of the early church had to contend with adversaries who bear much resemblance to today's "populist" Christianity. A popular Christianity that esteems riches and recognition to be the deserved rewards for continued faith in Jesus Christ. Should Christianity genuinely be a "health and wealth" contract only the foolish would turn it down. Since this idea is false, who are those that offer and who are they which accept such a contract? "Do not rich men oppress you, and draw you before the judgment seats? Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by which ye are called? For if there come unto your assembly a man with a gold ring, in goodly apparel, and there come in also a man in vile raiment; Are ye not then partial in yourselves, and are become judges of (with) evil thoughts?" (James 2:6, 7, 2, 4).

It may be said that there exists a pecking order - an order of importance and prestige held by a "populist" Christianity. A direct example between "two forms" of Christianity may be found in chapter 22 of the book of Numbers. In this chapter, a poor little servant donkey, who later actually speaks, receives a beating from the false teacher, Balaam (Heb.=destruction). As perceived by Balaam, the donkey delays the prophet in his pursuit of a reward for cursing the immoral enemies of a king named Balak (Heb.=to make empty). These enemies threaten the religious freedoms of the king and his followers. But, as we are shown in this story, Balaam is actually serving the wrong king. He serves an easy world conformity. In this scenario, Jesus, as the Angel of the Lord, appears and says to Balaam: "And the ass saw me, and turned from me these three times: unless she had turned from me, surely now also I had slain thee, and saved her alive" (Num 22:34).

In the temptation of Christ recorded in Matthew 4:3-10 there is an uncanny parallel between Balaam's donkey and Christ in the threefold sequence of physical need, self-harm, and worship. Some insightful teachers advise a new Christian to first seriously study the temptation of Christ rather than the Gospel of John. Jesus is love, yes; but what was his experience in love? and, what might the Christian expect?

THE GONZO JOURNALISM OF GRACE

Many books have been written about grace. Most are one-sided and outside-in homiletic treatments where grace is approached more by sentimentality than zealous defense. Abraham was declared righteous by God when he believed in what God said. Only one other man in the OT was declared righteous by God (other persons are named by the NT in Hebrews 11). The grandson of Aaron, Phineas, was a priest who acted in the defense of God's honor in response to the false teaching of Balaam which had seduced the Israelites. Through Abraham, the entrance into grace is typified. Through Phineas, faithful action within grace is typified. I understand these two men as demonstrating the meritless gift of grace through faith and the meritorious rewards of action because one has received the free gift of grace. Both together encompass the Christian life. This is in contradiction to behavior grounded in biblical commands and a reward of salvation for continuing faith.

Grace is the all-important theme of this work. The enemies of grace are found in the house of her friends. If there is no outrage at the parasitic nature of a false Christianity that ridicules the grace that sustains true believers; that holds the true children of God up to mockery and contempt for holding to the "law of Christ" and not the Law of Moses; that unreservedly asserts the child of God is lying about God's Word when assurance in the blood of Christ for salvation is claimed. Then where, I ask, is the love for Christ in those who will not and cannot defend the honor of Christ who died so that they could live? May it be recognized and well understood that the assumption of a higher ground of morality is the same turn of logic that is used by secular moral relativism to silence any arguments about moral standards. A Christianity based on broken legal commands that can destroy God's grace is in league with the world - certainly not Christ and the teachings of grace. This is a much more vital threat than secular atheism. The fact that the unsaved are atheist is hardly news or a threat to a properly informed Christian. The correct response of a worthy and pious mind is to recognize the tactical diversion of an extra-biblical threat from an atheistic world-view for what it is, namely: Get a grip, man, that's the mission field not the battlefield!

But, then, how may the proper battle be fought? By being a proper witness who defends God's saving grace in the presence of the mission field. By exposing "spiritual" sin and cleaning first the house of the Lord. How then may "spiritual" sin be known and proven beyond all doubt? How may the false friends be exposed for the "spiritual" crime from which they earn their livelihood? How may true believers who are zealous for the honor of Christ remove this insult to the grace of God, first from their own lives and then the stain from the honor of Christianity? The answer is simple by understanding grace. The process is not so easy. The transformation of the spiritual mind takes much Scripture and dedicated attention. Also, a guide is needed. Someone or something, who Christ has instructed and prepared for such a purpose. Someone who has been there and come back to tell others. This book is a guide that will detail that journey.

To begin to understand the position and moral high ground assumed by a false Christianity, one must first appreciate that God's offer of salvation in Christ, on the sole condition of faith, is a very straight forward proposition. However, sadly, as religious and pretentious men would have it, no straight forward proposition is preached by a "populist" Christianity. A higher moral ground than grace has been claimed. In a word a Mountain, the symbol of a kingdom. Willful ignorance is extremely hard to separate from convenient ignorance. In the OT this is dramatically illustrated: "Then said Micah, Now I know that the Lord will do me good, seeing I have a Levite to my priest" (Judges 17:13). Concerning Micah, Dr. C. I. Scofield writes, "A striking illustration of all apostasy. With his entire departure from the revealed will of God concerning worship and priesthood, there is yet an exaltation of false priesthood. Saying, "Blessed be thou of Jehovah," Micah's mother makes an idol; and Micah expects the blessings of Jehovah because he has linked his idolatry to the ancient Levitical order." i

The Gospel record of Jesus Christ in Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, and the first chapter of Acts has been divinely written to be historically correct. The record within the four Gospels is chronologically accurate. There exists only minor perceived exceptions which do not actually conflict; but only provide different details of different incidents at different times. Many common scenarios are contained in the first three Synoptic Gospels. This having been said, the very existence of this correct historical record invites the grossly false and insulting misconceptions that have been preached as so-called "true" doctrines of "the gospel" by false Protestants teachers for centuries. Is this to say the Bible is used against the Bible. An emphatic affirmative is the one answer. Bear in mind the corrupted religion depicted above, from the OT with Micah as the example. Does this seem terribly confusing? Confusion is not of the Lord's making; but perplexity is the stumbling stone that discourages the unsaved who are curious and entangles the believer who is immature. Lazy minds crippled by 10 second sound bytes are not able to digest the mature spiritual "meat" of God's grace contained in Scripture. No clear distinction can be made between law and grace until a knowledge of both is obtained by contrasting one to the other.

To properly separate myth and false doctrine in "populist" Christianity from the pure teachings of NT grace, and, to understand grace from the "inside-out," as opposed to a superficial "outside-in," is a formidable task. Beyond any personal doubt, this fact has been demonstrated as a result of this extended effort. Over 7000 pages of theological instruction and references, along with three Bible translations, have been scoured and gleaned to assemble the doctrines of central importance. These teachings of God's grace have been selected to produce the proofs used in this investigative report.

A correct exposition of grace needs a highly subjective and radically honest comparison to non-grace. A passionate and dedicated, highly subjective, non-fiction - a gonzo journalism of grace - was used to identify the source, not symptoms, of misleading propaganda that would diminish the reverence that the grace of God deserves. The word "propaganda" has its origin in the 1700's. It is derived from the Latin expression, Congregatio de Propaganda Fide, "Congregation for the Propagation of the Faith."

My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave



Post Note #1: More detailed reading on the historical background of today's populist Christianity may be found at http://www.spurgeon.org/downgrd.htm

Post Note #2: An interesting, yet criticaly relevant, abstract to "gonzo journalism" is thoughtfully stated by Mike Madias (Clinical Sociologist, Freelance Journalist) at the following address: http://acjournal.org/holdings/vol3/Iss3/rogue4/madias.html




Footnotes

1 The earliest of the U.S. lodges, founded by authority of the Grand Lodge of England, were the First Lodge of Boston, established in 1733, and one in Philadelphia, established about the same time. By the time of the American Revolution, about 150 lodges existed in colonial America. American Freemasons today make up more than three-fourths of the total number of all members throughout the world; world membership exceeds 5 million. Microsoft Encarta 2006. 1993-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.

i Old Scofield Study System, Dr. C. I. Scofield, p 308

Reference: The excellent and comprehensive historical work by E. Brooks Holifield, Theology in America.

___________________________

Sunday, June 15, 2008

David, Goliath, and the Super-Self





by gonzodave





Dear Reader,

Sunday's Message 6.15.08



Precious ones in Christ Jesus, good morning. The OT story of David and Goliath is as familiar to many as any children's fairy tale. David was a Giant-Killer and Jack had magic beans. The botanical name for the chocolate bean plant is, Theobroma cacao, which literally means “food of the gods.” G K Chesterton in his essay "Heretics," when writing about the secular views held by H G Wells, penned the following in 1905:

""The Food of the Gods” is the tale of “Jack the Giant-Killer” told from the point of view of the giant. This has not, I think, been done before in literature; but I have little doubt that the psychological substance of it existed in fact. I have little doubt that the giant whom Jack killed did regard himself as the Superman. It is likely enough that he considered Jack a narrow and parochial person who wished to frustrate a great forward movement of the life-force.

If (as not infrequently was the case) he happened to have two heads, he would point out the elementary maxim which declares them to be better than one. He would enlarge on the subtle modernity of such an equipment, enabling a giant to look at a subject from two points of view, or to correct himself with promptitude. But Jack was the champion of the enduring human standards, of the principle of one man one head and one man one conscience, of the single head and the single heart and the single eye. Jack was quite unimpressed by the question of whether the giant was a particularly gigantic giant. All he wished to know was whether he was a good giant — that is, a giant who was any good to us.

What were the giant’s religious views; what were his views on politics and the duties of the citizen? Was he fond of children — or fond of them only in a dark and sinister sense? To use a fine phrase for emotional sanity, was his heart in the right place? Jack had sometimes to cut him up with a sword in order to find out. The old and correct story of Jack the Giant-Killer is simply the whole story of man; if it were understood we should need no Bibles or histories.

But the modern world in particular does not seem to understand it at all. The modern world, like Mr. Wells is on the side of the giants; the safest place, and therefore the meanest and the most prosaic. The modern world, when it praises its little Caesars, talks of being strong and brave: but it does not seem to see the eternal paradox involved in the conjunction of these ideas. The strong cannot be brave. Only the weak can be brave; and yet again, in practice, only those who can be brave can be trusted, in time of doubt, to be strong.

The only way in which a giant could really keep himself in training against the inevitable Jack would be by continually fighting other giants ten times as big as himself. That is by ceasing to be a giant and becoming a Jack. Thus that sympathy with the small or the defeated as such, with which we Liberals and Nationalists have been often reproached, is not a useless sentimentalism at all, as Mr. Wells and his friends fancy. It is the first law of practical courage. To be in the weakest camp is to be in the strongest school.

Nor can I imagine anything that would do humanity more good than the advent of a race of Supermen, for them to fight like dragons. If the Superman is better than we, of course we need not fight him; but in that case, why not call him the Saint? But if he is merely stronger (whether physically, mentally, or morally stronger, I do not care a farthing), then he ought to have to reckon with us at least for all the strength we have. If we are weaker than he, that is no reason why we should be weaker than ourselves. If we are not tall enough to touch the giant’s knees, that is no reason why we should become shorter by falling on our own. But that is at bottom the meaning of all modern hero-worship and celebration of the Strong Man, the Caesar the Superman. That he may be something more than man, we must be something less.


As Mr. Chesterton conveyed so well almost 100 years ago; Where do Supermen belong? Supermen are a construct of culture. The previous worship of eugenics as the hope of a better man has been recycled by today's chocolate scientific marriage of en vitro conception, stem-cells, and let us be honest - abortion. Do any of these cultural concepts belong inside the church? Can man make a better man?

It is of no matter that society has carried forth the idea of an improved man; What else can the hopelessly lost hope for? Another quote by Mr. Chesterton would say: "Millions of mild black-coated men call themselves sane and sensible merely because they always catch the fashionable insanity, because they are hurried into madness after madness by the maelstrom of the world."

Giants rule the earth and poor Jack has no biblical license to contend with them. Should he assume a God sanctioned warrant, he merely becomes the Giant for the Jacks of today's anti-Christian activist to sharpen their teeth upon. How can this Christian activism be considered bringing the "Good News" to the lost?

Paul stated very clearly "It is not for me to judge the lost." But then again, he stated very clearly that the church must judge the church. Paul "would not stand for one hour" in silent suffering of a false gospel. Paul was a born-again Jack who was a former Giant. The pitfalls and victories of Paul were witnessed by the unsaved, the soon-to-be-saved, and the forever saved in the early church.

The Giants who invade and profess a secular Christianity are the legal foes for Jack's courage. By this effort Jack may be seen by the unsaved as practicing what the Bible teaches, not the world. Ecumenicalism, contrary to popular thought, regardless of the appearance of a lack of unity, reduces Jack to the mindless apathy of political correctness, where every liberty is granted except the liberty of disagreement.

In this mistaken generalization of unity, borrowed from the world, Jack does does not contend for the sanctity of God's grace filled message of salvation. Had the Catholic Church not become a Giant, there would never have been a Martin Luther. The Jack who ignited the smoldering Protestant Reformation 400 years ago preached a salvation and justification by faith, not a probational ticket to heaven for Giants.

Go well in Christ Jesus on this resurrection day - Sunday, the eighth day of new beginnings.

That's my message.



My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave


Tuesday, June 10, 2008

"In Christ Alone" by Sinclair Ferguson


by gonzodave


Dear Reader,

I consider Sinclair Ferguson my pastor for Sunday sermons. Dr. Sinclair B. Ferguson has established himself as one of the premier, living Christian thinkers of today. It would be well worth your time to do a Google search on Dr. Ferguson and read the many interviews and articles that are available.

For the benefit of those who need to now - in the citation below - the first 3 chapters of this book can be downloaded for viewing or saved to your hard-drive, for a later reading at your leisure, by clicking on the second icon from the left inside the Adobe screen when the book cover is displayed. Also, you need to have Adobe Acrobat on your computer. After clicking on Download for free the file will load - slowly if you are on dial-up, be patient.

The publisher is Reformation Trust through Ligonier Ministries. The book is available at:In Christ Alone from Westminster Book Store who provided the following review and endorsements. Their book review blog site is:
http://www.westminsterbookstore.com

Noted theologian, pastor, and educator Dr. Sinclair B. Ferguson explores aspects of the person and work of Jesus in his latest book, In Christ Alone: Reflections on the Heart of the Gospel. This collection of articles, published earlier in Table Talk magazine and Eternity Magazine, is designed to help believers gain a better understanding of their Savior and the Christian faith, and to live out that faith in their day-to-day lives. In fifty short chapters arranged in six sections, Dr. Ferguson shows that Christ, who is fully God, took on humanity that He might be the Great High Priest of His people as well as the once-for-all sacrifice; that He now ministers to His people through His Spirit, crowning them with great and precious blessings; and that believers are called to duty, from cultivating contentment to mortifying sin. In Christ Alone is packed full of nuggets of Scriptural truth that will spark and fan the flames of the believer's love for the Savior who is so beautiful in His person and so faithful in His work on behalf of His beloved sheep.

Download for free the first three chapters (foreword by Alistair Begg).

"The title In Christ Alone is enough to make hearts brave and souls stand at attention. And Sinclair Ferguson, the consummate teacher, takes great pains to explain the supreme sufficiency of Jesus Christ and why He is enough.
-Joni Eareckson Tada, Founder, Joni and Friends International Disability Center

"In Christ Alone is a basic systematic theology in the form of a very readable book. Whether you are a new Christian looking for basic Christian doctrine or a more mature one wanting a refresher, this book will both instruct you and delight you. I warmly commend it to all Christians who want to grow in their faith."
-Jerry Bridges, Bible Teacher and Author of The Pursuit of Holiness and other titles


My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave


Sunday, June 8, 2008

"The Christian Communication Crisis"


by gonzodave


Dear Reader,

As communication (koinonia) is a subject dear to my soul, I offer this well stated piece by L.Cruz III. Please visit his website www.exploringchrist.com for a wealth of insightful articles, video, and the webcast radio show "Focus on the ONE!"

My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave



The Christian Communication Crisis!



ExploringChrist.com Logo 1

by L Cruz III
Jan 13, 2008

In the process of making this website I have quickly discovered that one of Christianity's biggest obstacles, in relation to new seekers, is less-than-favorable communication.

We Christians all too often speak to nonbelievers in a language only the choir understands. While "church talk" may be appropriate among other Christians, it means little or nothing to new seekers or lost sheep. It is like speaking Swahili to an English-speaking audience.

As a result of this alienating practice, I have seen befuddled secularists determine that Christianity cannot relate to the present world and is therefore no longer relevant. We Christians know that such a position is not only inaccurate, but it is also impossible. But how will secularists ever come to know this if we do not learn to communicate more effectively?

Therefore, I have a cheerful challenge for all church leaders, Christian websites, evangelists and followers of Christ in general. Work on communicating more effectively with the secular world!

Consider dedicating a service, a web page, or a handout to preaching the foundations of religion in plain English. If you are unsure what information to cover, consider following the lead of the church fathers. Not only did their discoveries lead to Catholicism, Calvinism, Wesleyanism (Armenianism) and various other offshoots, but many of them were also sainted.

And, how did they gain their wisdom? They merged philosophy and theology into a single theosophy. And then they shared their theosophical discoveries in terms the people of their day could understand.

A great source of life-changing theosophical breakthroughs is Christian apologetics. (Perhaps my resources can give you some ideas.)

If you still aren't sold on the idea, consider these points.

Have you ever noticed that the authors of the Bible rarely if ever attempted to prove the existence of God? That is because God's existence was common knowledge. They knew something that many of us don't...they knew that it was impossible for Him not to exist. Therefore, an apologetic was rarely if ever offered.

The same can be said for many of today's churches. Christian leaders often spend much time communicating the profundity, wonders and beauty of Christ without ever communicating WHY they know God exists at all.

The "whys" are very vital. It is not only what secularists want to learn, but it can also strengthen the faith of seasoned believers.

I pray we can all meet this challenge.

Do not conform any longer to the pattern of this world, but be transformed by the renewing of your mind. Then you will be able to test and approve what God's will is—his good, pleasing and perfect will. (Romans 12:2) NIV

_____________________

Salvation By Grace Is For Faith!


by gonzodave


Dear Reader,



Sunday's Message



Precious ones in Christ, as an illustration of God's grace I quote the following from Mr. J. Mark Bertrand's review of a new publication of the 1599 Geneva Bible by Tolle Lege.
http://jmarkbertrand.typepad.com/bibledesign/2007/09/the-1599-geneva.html

"To be perfectly honest, the thing that has always interested me about the Geneva Bible isn't the translation itself, but the notes. They strike an interesting balance between the pastoral and the theological -- or perhaps I should say that they blend the two, as if there is no proper distinction to be made. I'll try to illustrate this with just one example. 1 Corinthians 4:7 reads, "For who separateth thee? and what hast thou, that thou hast not received? if thou hast received it, why rejoicest thou, as though thou hadst not received it?" The Geneva Bible makes two notes on the passage. First, it offers some practical application: "He showeth a good means to bridle pride: first, if thou consider how rightly thou exemptest thyself out of the number of others, seeing thou art a man thyself: again, if thou consider that although thou have something more than other men have, yet thou hast it not but by God's bountifulness. And what wise man is he that will brag of another's goodness, and that against God?" Then the Geneva Bible draws out a theological implication of the passage: "There is nothing then in us of nature, that is worthy of commendation: but all that we have, we have it of grace, which the Pelagians and half Pelagians will not confess."

If the Geneva note seems unreasonable, or that the verse itself is obscure, consider that the Corinthians had divided into groups which "quarreled" and claimed to follow a difference between Paul and Apollos. This was the main theme of the letter Paul wrote to correct a mistaken assumption (ref. chapter 1).

The KJV translation is very close to this Geneva verse. Keep in mind that the unsurpassed work of William Tyndale contributed almost 90% of the earlier Geneva and the later 1611 King James translations. The modern Amplified Bible rendering reads:

1 Cor 4:7 For who separates you from the others [as a faction leader]? [Who makes you superior and sets you apart from another, giving you the preeminence ?] What have you that was not given to you? If then you received it [from someone], why do you boast as if you had not received [but had gained it by your efforts]? AMP

The more recently discovered (Chester Beatty) sources of the NET Bible render the just prior verse 6:

1 Cor 4:6 I have applied these things to myself and Apollos because of you, brothers and sisters (see verse 1:10), so that through us you may learn "not to go beyond what is written," so that that none of you will be puffed up in favor of the one over the other. NET

To go beyond what was written at the time of this Epistle was the OT. The NT expounded the New Covenant of God's graceful salvation. Which is a gift - not a means to an end of approved personal behavior AFTER death. Paul writes in the prior verse 5:

1 Cor 5ff ... Wait until the Lord comes. He will bring to light the hidden things of darkness and reveal the motives of hearts. Then each will receive recognition (or praise) from God. NET

Now judgment for darkness and praise from God after death, or when Christ returns, is a far cry from salvation itself. "DO NOT GO BEYOND WHAT IS WRITTEN," and "as the Pelagians and half Pelagians will not confess."

The Pelagians referred to in this 400 year old Bible of the Puritans are today's professors, preachers, and followers of Arminian Christianity. A Christianity that promotes free will on the one hand and hides its graceless Governmental theory of atonement for salvation on the other. They will not confess eternal salvation by grace through faith from the moment of saving faith.

Now God's grace is because of Christ and His work. Grace is never a gift because of faith; rather, God's plan designed His works of grace for faith. Grace is salvation. The gospel of the grace of God is to be believed because of the value of the death of Christ - the substitutionary blood of Christ is the core of the gospel message. Christ died for you.

The Arminian caveat says: Salvation by grace is for continued faith. The gospel laid upon the brass alter of judgment and the answer of confession is a half-step. The sin of pride is not left behind! It is a pretense of humility, an insult to God's grace, and a denial of the true gospel to say: I hope I go to heaven.

The one who believes in Christ completely for faith proudly claims and confesses: Salvation by grace is for faith!

Go well in Christ Jesus on this eighth day - the resurrection day of new beginnings.

That's my message.



My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave

Tuesday, June 3, 2008

The Message of Reconciliation


by gonzodave





Is the Bible true or a particular philosophy conjured by men (i.e., revelation versus rationalization)? I suggest this to be the single, the core question to be answered and determined by whosoever in this life. The Great Truth of the Bible is salvation by God's grace.


Dear Reader,

In Romans 5:11 the NT KJV renders the word "atonement" only once. The Revised Version later translated this word more correctly as "reconciliation." The thought behind the use by the KJV of atonement in the OT (a word invented by the KJV translators) is at-one-ment. At-one-ment may be considered as referring to the atoning death of Christ through which all men are "reconciled" to God, or restored to His favor.

Titus 3:5-7 When the kindness of God our Savior and his love for mankind appeared, he saved us not by works of righteousness that we have done but on the basis of his mercy, through the washing of the new birth and the renewing of the Holy Spirit, whom he poured out on us in full measure through Jesus Christ our Savior. And so, since we have been justified by his grace, we become heirs with the confident expectation of eternal life. NET





Men may reconcile themselves to God, accept His grace through faith in Jesus as their Savior, and be forgiven and declared "justified" for all eternity by the transformation of the "new birth" in Christ. Reconciliation is the finished work of Christ that is the ground upon which the unsaved may receive the gift of "justification by faith." The saved saint receives the "position" of receiving the imputed righteousness of Christ, but not the present experience in this life. However, God knows that a regenerated Christian, enabled by the indwelling power of the Holy Spirit, has the strength to live with two opposing natures - the new divine spiritual nature and the old flesh nature "of the world" inherited with their first birth in Adam (viz. the experience of Paul in Romans chapter 7).

By faith all may receive forgiveness and the cancellation of the demerit of personal sin. By grace through faith all who believe in the living unseen Savior receive the gift of the righteousness of Christ and His eternal life. This unbelievably good news is available because of the reconciliation provided by the death of Christ.

Rom 5:10 For if while we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of his Son, how much more, since we have been reconciled, will we be saved by his life? 5:11 Not only this, but we also rejoice in God through our Lord Jesus Christ, through whom we have now received this reconciliation. NET

Easton's Bible Dictionary

Reconciliation: a change from enmity to friendship. It is mutual, i.e., it is a change wrought in both parties who have been at enmity. (1.) In Col. 1:21, 22, the word there used refers to a change wrought in the personal character of the sinner who ceases to be an enemy to God by wicked works, and yields up to him his full confidence and love. In 2 Cor. 5:20 the apostle beseeches the Corinthians to be "reconciled to God", i.e., to lay aside their enmity. (2.) Rom. 5:10 refers not to any change in our disposition toward God, but to God himself, as the party reconciled. Romans 5:11 teaches the same truth. From God we have received "the reconciliation" (R.V.), i.e., he has conferred on us the token of his friendship. So also 2 Cor. 5:18, 19 speaks of a reconciliation originating with God, and consisting in the removal of his merited wrath. In Eph. 2:16 it is clear that the apostle does not refer to the winning back of the sinner in love and loyalty to God, but to the restoration of God's forfeited favour. This is effected by his justice being satisfied, so that he can, in consistency with his own nature, be favourable toward sinners. Justice demands the punishment of sinners. The death of Christ satisfies justice, and so reconciles God to us. This reconciliation makes God our friend, and enables him to pardon and save us. (See ATONEMENT.)

The death of Christ has universal value, but only personal benefit.

2 Cor 5:14 For the love of Christ26 controls us, since we have concluded this, that Christ27 died for all; therefore all have died. 5:15 And he died for all so that those who live should no longer live for themselves but for him who died for them and was raised.28 5:16 So then from now on we acknowledge29 no one from an outward human point of view.30 Even though we have known Christ from such a human point of view,31 now we do not know him in that way any longer. NET

"That one died for all, therefore all died." Christ secured and provided for everyone in the value of His death. "Henceforth know we no man after the flesh." That Jesus died for all alike is the greatest thing that can be said of an individual. It is the common shared dignity of mankind and was given to men by God. Every man, woman and child is someone that Christ died for.

2 Cor 5:17 So then, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; what is old has passed away32look, what is new33 has come!34 5:18 And all these things are from God who reconciled us to himself through Christ, and who has given us the ministry of reconciliation. 5:19 In other words, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting people's trespasses against them, and he has given us35 the message of reconciliation. 5:20 Therefore we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were making His plea36 through us. We plead with you37 on Christ's behalf, "Be reconciled to God!" 5:21 God38 made the one who did not know sin39 to be sin for us, so that in him40 we would become the righteousness of God. NET

Reconciliation may be defined as when someone or something is thoroughly changed and adjusted to something which is a standard, as a watch may be adjusted to a chronometer. Since the position of the world (fallen human kind) before God is completely changed through the death of Christ, God's own attitude towards man can no longer be the same. He is prepared to deal with souls in the light of what Christ has accomplished. This seems to be a change in God, of course, but is not a reconciliation. God, on the contrary, believes completely in the thing which Christ has done and accepts it, so as to continue being just, although able thereby to justify any sinner who accepts the Savior as his reconciliation. As stated in John 3:16:

For this is the way36 God loved the world (fallen human kind): He gave his one and only37 Son, so that everyone who believes in him will not perish38 but have eternal life.39"

Please note three changes in relationship connected with reconciliation in 2 Corinthians 5.

Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer writes:

  • verse 17 - That which is a positional and structural spiritual relationship where a living saved soul has had the value and merit of the death of Christ applied to him or her. Having received grace through faith he/she is seen to be a "new creation" 'in Christ," i.e. biblically, a "brethren," a "saint," a "Christian," a "new man," and a "living stone."
  • verse 19 - That which is a general relationship, or the basis on which salvation may be offered to all mankind. Whereby only one act of obedience is ever required of the unsaved. This one act is to "obey the gospel of Jesus Christ" in order to become one of everyone who believes in Him.
  • verse 20 - That which is a personal relationship, a mental attitude or the trust of the individual heart, when one sees and accepts the value in the death of Christ for him or her.

The death of Christ reconciles all humanity to the standard of God, having satisfied condemnation, judgment, and demerit for all trespasses/sin save one, the unforgivable sin. The judgment of life the sin of rejecting, until your dying day, the facts revealed in Scripture of the reason why Christ died on the cross and who He is. As explained in the verses following John 3:16.

John 3:17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world,40 but that the world should be saved through him. 3:18 The one who believes in him is not condemned.41 The one who does not believe has been condemned42 already, because he has not believed in the name of the one and only43 Son of God. 3:19 Now this is the basis for judging:44 that the light has come into the world and people45 loved the darkness rather than the light, because their deeds were evil. NET

The words of Jesus spoken in the night to His visitor, the teacher of the law Nicodemus, apply to each and every one today.

John 3:7 Do not be amazed that I said to you, 'You must all be born from above.'15 3:14 Just as31 Moses lifted up the serpent32 in the wilderness,33 so must the Son of Man be lifted up,34 3:15 so that everyone who believes in him may have eternal life."35 NET

Why is the cross the only way? Why was reconciliation needed? God cannot choose less than Himself. God is limited by His own nature and He cannot change the holy demands of His own righteousness. How can God be both just and the justifier of sinners? Thus, the question and the answer is not of human origin, although understandable to the human mind. The inherent anti-pole of virtue is sin. A creature can choose less than God; a creature can choose himself. All that righteousness can demand has been met by the Judge and the redemption price has been paid by the Judge. As revealed in Scripture:

2 Cor 5:19 In other words, in Christ God was reconciling the world to himself, not counting people's trespasses against them, and he has given us35 the message of reconciliation. NET

The problem created by sin was in the very nature of God Himself before any man came into being. The cross is His solution of His own problem as determined by Him and revealed to us "in the fullness of times". Sins judgments are already perfectly met. God added humanity to His nature and became a man so that He could die. The purpose of His dying was to "take away the sin of the world (fallen human kind)" because "He became a curse for us," "He bore our sins in His body on a tree," "He tasted death for every man," and "He loved me and gave Himself for me."

2 Cor 5:21 God38 made the one who did not know sin39 to be sin for us, so that in him40 we would become the righteousness of God. NET

God's own wisdom has been disclosed in solving His own problem of saving sinners, and this, by "the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ." God has, for His own sake, removed every moral hindrance which His infinite holiness might see in sinful man, because each sinner has been placed, through the substitutionary death of Christ, beyond his/her own execution. Therefore, the ground of condemnation is forever past and fallen human kind is reconciled to God by God Himself to Himself. Man is only asked to believe on the facts thus revealed: God has been merciful and absolute salvation is available now without reserve. All the work has been done by God because only He could accomplish it.

Redemption by the cross was not God's second best as contrasted to the innocence of Adam in the garden. In the divine councils of God from the foundation of the world, the accomplishment of the cross is to place the redeemed above angels and archangels, as sons and daughters of God that have been perfected into the very "image of Christ". There is nothing in the highest heaven beyond this. It is the greatest possible thing that God can do. It is the infinite demonstration of His grace. God's grace in action is more than love. It is love operating in the full recognition and adjustment to every demand of righteousness. "Even so might grace reign through righteousness unto eternal life by Jesus Christ our Lord."

By the cross God has demonstrated our sin, His own righteousness, and His own unmeasured love. He has spoken to us through His Son. The reasonable requirement is that this message be believed. This is the only condition given in the bible on which one may enter God's saving grace.

My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave

____________________________________

NET Bible Translation Notes

* Greek fonts are not available in this .txt file

2 COR 5

26tn The phrase hJ ajgavph tou' Cristou' (Jh agaph tou Cristou, "the love of Christ") could be translated as either objective genitive ("our love for Christ") or subjective genitive ("Christ's love for us"). Either is grammatically possible, but with the reference to Christ's death for all in the following clauses, a subjective genitive ("Christ's love for us") is more likely.
27tn Grk "one"; the referent (Christ) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
28tn Or "but for him who died and was raised for them."
29tn Grk "we know."
30tn Grk "no one according to the flesh." 31tn Grk "we have known Christ according to the flesh."
32tn Grk "old things have passed away."
33tc Most mss have the words taV pavnta (ta panta, "all things"; cf. KJV "behold, all things are become new"), some after kaivna (kaina, "new"; D2 K L P Y 104 326 945 2464 pm) and others before it (6 33 81 614 630 1241 1505 1881 pm). The reading without taV pavnta, however, has excellent support from both the Western and Alexandrian texttypes (Ì46 Í B C D* F G 048 0243 365 629 1175 1739 pc co), and the different word order of the phrase which includes it ("all things new" or "new all things") in the ms tradition indicates its secondary character. This secondary addition may have taken place because of assimilation to taV deV pavnta (ta de panta, "and all [these] things") that begins the following verse.
34tn Grk "new things have come [about]."
35tn Or "he has entrusted to us."
36tn Or "as though God were begging."
37tn Or "we beg you."
38tn Grk "He"; the referent (God) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
39sn The one who did not know sin is a reference to Jesus Christ.
40sn That is, "in Christ."

JOHN 3

15tn Or "born again." The same Greek word with the same double meaning occurs in v. 3.
31tn Grk "And just as."
32sn Or the snake, referring to the bronze serpent mentioned in Num 21:9.
33sn An allusion to Num 21:5-9.
34sn So must the Son of Man be lifted up. This is ultimately a prediction of Jesus' crucifixion. Nicodemus could not have understood this, but John's readers, the audience to whom the Gospel is addressed, certainly could have (compare the wording of John 12:32). In John, being lifted up refers to one continuous action of ascent, beginning with the cross but ending at the right hand of the Father. Step 1 is Jesus' death; step 2 is his resurrection; and step 3 is the ascension back to heaven. It is the upward swing of the "pendulum" which began with the incarnation, the descent of the Word become flesh from heaven to earth (cf. Paul in Phil 2:5-11). See also the note on the title Son of Man in 1:51.
35tn This is the first use of the term zwhVn aijwvnion (zwhn aiwnion) in the Gospel, although zwhv (zwh) in chap. 1 is to be understood in the same way without the qualifying aijwvnio" (aiwnios).
sn Some interpreters extend the quotation of Jesus' words through v. 21.
36tn Or "this is how much"; or "in this way." The Greek adverb ou{tw" (Joutws) can refer (1) to the degree to which God loved the world, that is, to such an extent or so much that he gave his own Son (see R. E. Brown, John [AB], 1:133-34; D. A. Carson, John, 204) or (2) simply to the manner in which God loved the world, i.e., by sending his own son (see R. H. Gundry and R. W. Howell, "The Sense and Syntax of John 3:14-17 with Special Reference to the Use of Ou{tw"w{ste in John 3:16," NovT 41 [1999]: 24-39). Though the term more frequently refers to the manner in which something is done (see BDAG 741-42 s.v. ou{tw/ou{tw"), the following clause involving w{ste (Jwste) plus the indicative (which stresses actual, but [usually] unexpected result) emphasizes the greatness of the gift God has given. With this in mind, then, it is likely (3) that John is emphasizing both the degree to which God loved the world as well as the manner in which He chose to express that love. This is in keeping with John's style of using double entendre or double meaning. Thus, the focus of the Greek construction here is on the nature of God's love, addressing its mode, intensity, and extent.
37tn Although this word is often translated "only begotten," such a translation is misleading, since in English it appears to express a metaphysical relationship. The word in Greek was used of an only child (a son [Luke 7:12, 9:38] or a daughter [Luke 8:42]). It was also used of something unique (only one of its kind) such as the mythological Phoenix (1 Clement 25:2). From here it passes easily to a description of Isaac (Heb 11:17 and Josephus, Ant. 1.13.1 [1.222]) who was not Abraham's only son, but was one-of-a-kind because he was the child of the promise. Thus the word means "one-of-a-kind" and is reserved for Jesus in the Johannine literature of the NT. While all Christians are children of God (tevkna qeou', tekna qeou), Jesus is God's Son in a unique, one-of-a-kind sense. The word is used in this way in all its uses in the Gospel of John (1:14, 1:18, 3:16, and 3:18).
38tn In John the word ajpovllumi (apollumi) can mean either (1) to be lost (2) to perish or be destroyed, depending on the context.
39sn The alternatives presented are only two (again, it is typical of Johannine thought for this to be presented in terms of polar opposites): perish or have eternal life.
40sn That is, "to judge the world to be guilty and liable to punishment."
41tn Grk "judged."
42tn Grk "judged."
43tn See the note on the term "one and only" in 3:16.
44tn Or "this is the reason for God judging," or "this is how judgment works."
45tn Grk "and men," but in a generic sense, referring to people of both genders (as "everyone" in v. 20 makes clear).


References and citations are from: Systematic Theology, Vol. 8, Doctrinal Summarization, p 262 and Salvation - God's Marvelous Work of Grace by Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer; Easton's Bible Dictionary (freeware); all Bible verses and notes are from the NET, New English Translation (NeXt) Bible 2nd Beta Edition - (freeware @ www.bible.org).



David Coulon 2007-2008
Creative Commons 3.0 Non-derivative Non-Commercial use license. Some Rights Reserved. Free to share. Use with proper credit only.

Saturday, May 24, 2008

The Two Gospels - A Comic Tragedy


by gonzodave




Rom 5:12 For if by one man's offense death reigned by one; much more they which receive abundance of grace and of the gift of righteousness shall reign in life by one, Jesus Christ. KJV

1 Cor 15:21-22 For since by man came death, by man came also the resurrection of the dead. For as in Adam all die, even so in Christ shall all be made alive. KJV

Heb 9:28 So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many: and unto them that look for Him shall He appear the second time without [apart from] sin unto salvation. KJV




Life is a short airplane flight. It is impossible that the pilot will discover a fatal hidden flaw in the wing of her single seat plane. She is flying over a vast oceanic world inhabited by sharks. A parachute is available.

This is the gospel message on the pilot's radio: "Jesus Christ says: 'All pilots were born to die and go to perdition because of a fatally damaged airplane;1 He will save and regenerate the spirit, body, and soul of all living men who jump without a parachute and trust Him for salvation because He came and died to defeat all the sharks.'"

Another gospel radio transmission is: "Jesus Christ says: 'All pilots were born to die and go to perdition because they do not fight sharks; He will reward the souls of all dead men who have become good shark fighters and trust Him for salvation. And this because - He is the great example who came and died to show mankind how to fight sharks.'"


The pilot may either wake-up to this false dilemma, or not. The awakened pilot realizes that through no fault of her own, she is going to die, but more importantly, her everlasting fate is immanent. By faith she is required to take a leap and leave the safety of a terminally flawed airplane. However, she must leave before it is too late.

The end of this analogy is: skeptical pilots and shark fighters alike, become eternal sharks in the sea of lost mankind; but - those who believe and act in trust that Christ defeated all the sharks will live with Him in a regenerated spirit, body, and soul.

______________________________________


The above illustration to a true decision of faith may be exemplified in the enigma of the following verses. Which can only be clarified by the different Greek words and meanings which underlie the one English word "life" used in the KJV and other translations.

Mtw 10:39 Whoever finds his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life because of me will find it. NET

Mark 8:35 For whoever wants to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake and for the gospel will save it. NET

John 12:25 The one who loves his life destroys it, and the one who hates his life in this world guards it for eternal life. NET

______________________________________

LIFE

Excerpt from Vine's Expository Dictionary
vines.mike-obrien.net
______________________________________

Life, Living, Lifetime, Life-giving
______________________________________

1 zoe (noun)

(Eng., "zoo," "zoology") is used in the NT "of life as a principle, life in the absolute sense, life as God has it, that which the Father has in Himself, and which He gave to the Incarnate Son to have in Himself, Joh. 5:26, and which the Son manifested in the world, 1Jo. 1:2. From this life man has become alienated in consequence of the Fall, Eph. 4:18, and of this life men become partakers through faith in the Lord Jesus Christ, Joh. 3:15, who becomes its Author to all such as trust in Him, Ac. 3:15, and who is therefore said to be 'the life' of the believer, Col. 3:4, for the life that He gives He maintains, Joh. 6:35,63. Eternal life is the present actual possession of the believer because of his relationship with Christ, Joh. 5:24; 1Jo. 3:14, and that it will one day extend its domain to the sphere of the body is assured by the Resurrection of Christ, 2Co. 5:4; 2Ti. 1:10. This life is not merely a principle of power and mobility, however, for it has moral associations which are inseparable from it, as of holiness and righteousness. Death and sin, life and holiness, are frequently contrasted in the Scriptures. "Zoe is also used of that which is the common possession of all animals and men by nature, Ac. 17:25; 1Jo. 5:16, and of the present sojourn of man upon the earth with reference to its duration, Lu. 16:25; 1Co. 15:19; 1Ti. 4:8; 1Pe. 3:10. 'This life' is a term equivalent to 'the gospel,' 'the faith,' 'Christianity,' Ac. 5:20."* [* From Notes on Galatians, by Hogg and Vine. pp. 324,325.] Death came through sin, Ro. 5:12, which is rebellion against God. Sin thus involved the forfeiting of the "life." "The life of the flesh is in the blood," Le. 17:11. Therefore the impartation of "life" to the sinner must be by a death caused by the shedding of that element which is the life of the flesh. "It is the blood that maketh atonement by reason of the life" (id., RV). The separation from God caused by the forfeiting of the "life" could be removed only by a sacrifice in which the victim and the offerer became identified. This which was appointed in the typical offerings in Israel received its full accomplishment in the voluntary sacrifice of Christ. The shedding of the blood in the language of Scripture involves the taking or the giving of the "life." Since Christ had no sins of his own to die for, His death was voluntary and vicarious, John 10:15 with Isa. 53:5,10,12; 2Co. 5:21. In His sacrifice He endured the Divine judgment due to man's sin. By this means the believer becomes identified with Him in His deathless "life," through His resurrection, and enjoys conscious and eternal fellowship with God.



Commentary on Romans 5:12-21 in 'Jameison, Faussett, Brown'
http://bible.christiansunite.com/jfb.cgi?b=45&c=5

On this section, Note, (1) How gloriously does the Gospel evince its divine origin by basing all acceptable obedience on "peace with God," laying the foundations of this peace in a righteous "justification" of the sinner "through our Lord Jesus Christ," and making this the entrance to a permanent standing in the divine favor, and a triumphant expectation of future glory! (Ro 5:1,2). Other peace, worthy of the name, there is none; and as those who are strangers to it rise not to the enjoyment of such high fellowship with God, so they have neither any taste for it nor desire after it. (2) As only believers possess the true secret of patience under trials, so, although "not joyous but grievous" in themselves (Heb 12:17), when trials divinely sent afford them the opportunity of evidencing their faith by the grace of patience under them, they should "count it all joy" (Ro 5:3,4; and see Jas 1:2,3). (3) "Hope," in the New Testament sense of the term, is not a lower degree of faith or assurance (as many now say, I hope for heaven, but am not sure of it); but invariably means "the confident expectation of future good." It presupposes faith; and what faith assures us will be ours, hope accordingly expects. In the nourishment of this hope, the soul's look outward to Christ for the ground of it, and inward upon ourselves for evidence of its reality, must act and react upon each other (Ro 5:2 and Ro 5:4 compared). (4) It is the proper office of the Holy Ghost to beget in the soul the full conviction and joyful consciousness of the love of God in Christ Jesus to sinners of mankind, and to ourselves in particular; and where this exists, it carries with it such an assurance of final salvation as cannot deceive (Ro 5:5). (5) The justification of sinful men is not in virtue of their amendment, but of "the blood of God's Son"; and while this is expressly affirmed in Ro 5:9, our reconciliation to God by the "death of His Son," affirmed in Ro 5:10, is but a variety of the same statement. In both, the blessing meant is the restoration of the sinner to a righteous standing in the sight of God; and in both, the meritorious ground of this, which is intended to be conveyed, is the expiatory sacrifice of God's Son. (6) Gratitude to God for redeeming love, if it could exist without delight in God Himself, would be a selfish and worthless feeling; but when the one rises into the other--the transporting sense of eternal "reconciliation" passing into "gloriation in God" Himself--then the lower is sanctified and sustained by the higher, and each feeling is perfective of the other (Ro 5:11).



1) See Romans 5:12-17
Ocean photo
Airplane photo
Shark photo © Klaus Jost, www.jostimages.com



David Coulon 2007-2008

The City of God, Time Travel, and a Quantum Leap



by gonzodave





Dear Reader,

To become a Christian today is much like the experience of a time traveler. Speaking personally, yet for many, when I began seriously reading the Bible, it was from a self-centered point of view - from a position of: How does this passage apply to me? An assumption rarely corrected in the mind of church attending Christians is that whatever denominational perspective is taught, that was what the early believer in the first century, Apostlelic churches heard and believed. Is it necessary to say: "This is not - in all cases - true.?"

Should one enter the kingdom today, in order to find one's way to the city of the High Priest, it is necessary to know how and why the suburban real estate - surrounding the city - was developed. The suburbs are meant to be an attractive, enticing alternative to city-dwelling. A city which is marketed by the real estate developers as metaphorical. Thereby, it stands to reason, by living in and expanding the suburbs, those who wish to enter this future city will be accepted because of the fine housing and well manicured lawns that they have maintained.

I offer the highly regarded work of Phil Johnson - his "front page" is included here - as a useful way to understand why the suburbs are not the city. A literal city that has been divinely constructed without hands and freely given to the urban dweller. A quantum leap and improvement over living in the suburbs which truly fits the NT theme of ... now-but-not-yet.

My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave



Hall of Church History

Theology from A Bunch of Dead Guys™


The Hall of Church History
"Thus saith the LORD,
Stand ye in the ways, and see,
and ask for the old paths,
where is the good way,
and walk therein,
and ye shall find rest for
your souls" (Jeremiah 6:16).

FRIEND who noticed my reading habits asked, "Why would anyone want to study theology by reading A Bunch of Dead Guys? Shouldn't you focus mostly on current works, or risk becoming an irrelevant theological fossil?"
     My answer: the truth about God is timeless. The last infallible book of theology was written nearly two thousand years ago. In theology, if it's new, it probably isn't true.
     The best of the men featured here knew that. Though they are dead, they still speak (cf. Heb. 11:4). Scripture was their supreme rule of faith. Their theological line of descent is clearly traceable from the Reformers, to Augustine, to the Apostle Paul, to Isaiah, to Abraham—all the way back to the first promise God made to Adam in the Garden (Gen. 3:15).
     The entrance is at the top center of the map. Watch your step, though. As you walk through The Hall of Church History, if you veer too far to the right or to the left, you'll encounter people whose tendency has been to enshrine tradition over Scripture, or to pursue what is innovative and novel at the expense of what is sure and steadfast.
     These dark corners of The Hall of Church history can be interesting and informative. But we encourage guests to spend most of their time in the central hall, which takes you from the Church Fathers, through the Medieval Churchmen, down a narrow, treasure-filled hallway devoted to the Puritan and Reformed writers, to the more recent stalwarts of the faith. We have named this corridor "Berean Hall," in honor of those noble recipients of the apostolic message, who "received the word with all readiness of mind, and searched the scriptures daily, whether those things were so" (Acts 17:11).

Phil Johnson
Curator




Creative Commons 3.0 license David Coulon 2008. Use with credit.

Saturday, May 17, 2008

Update 1-4: The Manifesto of Evangelicalism, the Contemporary History of Neo-Evangelicalism, and Intellectual Assassination



by gonzodave





PREFACE

(Revised 5.24.08, latest update #4 - 5.16.08)

This is an update of my "gonzo journalism of grace" article/essay that will be developed over time. If you have read the previous UPDATES, please scroll down and find the beginning of the most recent posting.

Sadly, too many Christians have been lulled into the idea that Christianity is the same as "being nice." Quite to the contrary, Christianity is accepting and defending the truth of God's Word as revealed in NT Scripture, not personal opinions of how to impact the world. This is a complete reversal of priorities. Christians are the means whereby "the body of Christ" is self-developing until whatever proper number of those placed "in Christ" by the Holy Spirit is final. The focus, once again, is the completion of the kingdom, rather than a conversion of the world.

John 17:11 And now I am no more in the world, but these are in the world, and I come to thee, Holy Father keep through thine own name these whom thou hast given me, that they may be one as we are [implied - one]. (bold and brackets mine) KJV

Christianity and "the world" are polar opposites. God sees no shades of gray between them. We cannot see, but are told that Satan is the ruler of this age and the cosmos (KJV=world; Gk.=the organized world and its institutions controlled and executed by humankind. A different "world" underlies John 3:16 where the Greek specifies only unregenerate humanity, not the institutions of men controlled by Satan. In John 17:9 and Rev 13:8. Jesus did not pray to His "Holy Father" for the systems of the "world" which are anti-god and not theocratic as was the intention for OT Israel, which was chosen and unique.) This is according to the temporary permissive will of God until His kingdom comes in the blazing glory of our Savior and His will be done.

It required the writing of the NT to establish grace and salvation through the living, resurrected Jesus Christ. We learn from the Apostle Paul to be "quick to defend" God's gospel of grace against the pride of intellectualism (i.e., vain imaginations known in the primitive church as gnosticism). Much like Noah who "found grace" and preached for 120 years without the conversion of a single soul, it is the Christ-like effort and truth which we repeat that God accepts as credit to us for future rewards. And, as always, any success is to His credit and sovereignty.

Aside from the primary and serious difference in the salvation that is preached, today's Protestant Christianity properly falls into 3 current categories - fundamental, neo-evangelical, and liberal, or modernist. As can be easily discerned, a neo-evangelical view would be a middle-of-the-road compromise (viz., neutralism or religious humanism). Concerning contemporary neo-evangelicalism, Eerdman's Handbook to Christianity in America reads on page 319:

"The social gospel differed from evangelical reform movements like the Salvation Army in at least two respects. First, it tended to emphasize structural reforms, changes in law, government policy, and the formal institutions of society. Second, it was firmly rooted in Protestant liberal theology."



Dear Reader,

An Evangelical is commonly considered and explained as one who adheres to the historical gospel. This is more than a misrepresentation, it is a false claim and deliberate evasion of contemporary church history by those who because of their many advanced degrees and studies should know better.

A pro-comment concerning "The Manifesto of Evangelicalism" under the posting The Point of the Manifesto Put Simply May 08.08.
http://blog.bible.org/bock/node/369#comment-8126 reads:

"Manifesto
Submitted by dopderbeck1 (not verified) on Wed, 2008-05-14 07:05.

As a law professor who self-identifies as an evangelical, I think the Manifesto is an excellent and much-needed document, and I signed it without hesitation. Could I find nuances in it that I might not agree with 100%? Sure. But its tone, its holistic approach, its bold affirmation of vibrant and historic Christian faith, represent the very best ideals we should want to pursue -- ideals, I think, that go right back to Jesus' teaching and the Apostles' instructions to the early church as reflected in scripture."

The Apostle Paul writes to his "son in Christ" in 1 Tim 6:20: "O Timothy, guard {imperative-the gospel} and keep the deposit entrusted [to you]! Turn away from the irreverent babble and godless chatter, with the vain and empty and worldly phrases, and the subtleties and the contradictions in what is falsely called knowledge and spiritual illumination." {this writer} AMP

"All of us have been tempted to water down the gospel to make it palatable to a friend. We knew that we were wrong when we did it. New evangelicalism made it acceptable to water down the gospel. Campus Crusade's "Four Spiritual Laws" are a prime example. They give a diluted presentation of the gospel designed be non-offensive. Who could fail to be attracted to, "God loves you and offers a wonderful plan for your life:"? It is not false, but it is not the gospel as preached by Peter or Paul. It is an accommodation to the way the natural man thinks about himself. It produces an easy-believism in which every man is saved but lives just as he did before.

With this accommodation of the message to the natural man came an accommodation in the way of presenting the message. The historic method has always been what Scripture calls, "the foolishness of preaching." The new method became the selling of the gospel by the use of sports heroes, beauty queens and famous people."

John E. Ashbrook, New Neutralism II

"Not only is the new-brand Evangelicalism born of compromise, but in the second place, it is a movement nurtured on pride of intellect. The statements of its leading advocates indicate that these men are trying very, very hard to be accepted among `the upper four hundred' of the intelligentsia. This new crop of evangelical scholars has done graduate work at Harvard, Chicago University and Princeton, and they know a lot of answers that the common herd of fundamentalist preachers can't fathom. To speak very plainly, an attitude of intellectual snobbery is very typical of many of its leaders."

William E. Ashford, Evangelicalism: The New Neutralism (I)
_______________________________

FOREWORD

The following citation is somewhat extended, but necessary to establish my contra-view of the claims of neo-evangelicalism. Dr. John Ashbrook writes in New Neutralism II (1991):

"In 1958 when my father finished his eight page tract on new evangelicalism, he gave it the title, The New Neutralism. His thesis was that new evangelicalism was a movement which determined to take its stand halfway between fundamentalism on the right and modernism on the left. From its beginning new evangelicalism took a position on the top wire of the fence between belief and unbelief, in the no man's land between irreconcilable armies, and on the white line in the middle of the road. Neutrality has always been a precarious position, and precarious becomes "impossible" when the truth is involved. The title of my book indicates that it is a sequel and that I share my father's analysis of the position.

... As my father pointed out in his book, there is a tremendous pride of intellect in new evangelicalism. Let me quote again from Dr. Ockenga’s December 8, 1957 news release:

'The New Evangelicalism differs from Fundamentalism in its willingness to handle the social problems which Fundamentalism evaded ... The New Evangelical is willing to face the intellectual problems and meet them in the framework of modern learning ... The evangelical believes that Christianity is intellectually defensible, but the Christian cannot be obscurantist in scientific questions pertaining to the creation, the age of man, the universality of the flood and other moot Biblical questions.'

It seems to me that as Dr. (John) Ockenga paints the portrait of the new evangelical with his right hand, he caricatures the fundamentalist with his left. Do you see the picture? The fundamentalist is unwilling to handle social problems, unable to face intellectual problems, not possessing modern learning and obscurantist in scientific questions. Intellectual pride is peer pressure on a scholarly level, and it doesn't look any better on scholars than it does on teenagers. Ho, ye new evangelicals, wisdom has arrived and will die with us! From its inception new evangelicalism has been determined to impress the world with its intellect. It has craved the respect of academia. It has determined to earn plaudits at the fountainheads of secular learning. Why should this be a goal for the Christian?

... A book could easily be written defending the thesis that Wheaton College is the educational parent of new evangelicalism. Dr. Ockenga, and a majority of the founding fathers of Fuller in particular and new evangelicalism in general, had roots at Wheaton.

... New evangelicalism has a vise-like grip on most of the Christian colleges and theological schools of our day. It has accomplished an almost complete takeover of the Bible institutes and colleges which sprang up after the fundamentalist-liberal battle in the early part of this century.

... To the new evangelical, the fundamentalist errs by lacking love, scholarship and a social program. The modernist errs by lacking Biblical faith. The two lacks are made to sound quite equal. As a fundamentalist I do not accept the new evangelical's charge. I would observe that to lack Biblical faith is far more serious than to lack love, scholarship and a social program.

... Mass evangelism is the exclusive province of new evangelicalism. New evangelicals such as Billy Graham and Luis Palau are the household names of evangelism. Publishers whose materials once helped establish fundamental churches now train a generation of new evangelicals. New evangelicalism owns the music publishers. The churches which once thrilled to the wholesome songs of great Christians now are satisfied with the trash of contemporary Christian music drawn from the rhythm of the same world the Lord commanded us not to love. The new neutralism is not logical; it is not Scriptural; but it is overwhelmingly popular.

... It is no mistake to call him the father of new evangelicalism. Dr. Harold John Ockenga coined the name, "Neo-evangelicalism". When the National Association of Evangelicals was born in 1942, its first President was Harold John Ockenga. As a pastor he occupied the pulpit of Park Street Congregational Church on the edge of Boston Common. When Fuller Theological Seminary was founded in 1947 its first President was Dr. Harold John Ockenga. Christianity Today, the daily racing form of new evangelicalism, had its birth in 1956 as the brainchild of Billy Graham and his father-in-law, Dr. L. Nelson Bell.

... Dr. Ockenga's third "re" is the recapture of denominational leadership. I cannot see from the Bible that either men or denominations are ever recaptured from apostasy. New evangelicalism has been on the scene recapturing denominational leadership for over forty years. What denominational leadership has been reclaimed? Has the United Presbyterian Church been recaptured for Biblical Christianity? Has the Methodist Church been recaptured for the doctrine of the Wesleys? Has the leadership of the United Church of Christ been triumphantly recaptured? Men from these denominations have talked in theological dialogue with the scholars of new evangelicalism and have sat on the platforms of great crusades with Billy Graham, but the leadership of not one denomination has been reclaimed. The policy has failed, for it is a policy of horrible, hideous, compromise. God's program for apostasy is to separate from it, expose it and contend against it.

... Dr. Ockenga wrote the foreword to Dr. Harold Lindsell's book, The Battle for the Bible, published in 1976. In that foreword he said:

'Neo-evangelicalism [i.e., as opposed to Karl Barth's Neo-Orthodoxy] was born in 1948 in connection with a convocation address which I gave in the Civic Auditorium in Pasadena. While reaffirming the theological view of fundamentalism, this address repudiated its ecclesiology and its social theory. The ringing call for a repudiation of separatism and the summons to social involvement received a hearty response from many evangelicals... It differed from fundamentalism in its repudiation of separatism and its determination to engage itself in the theological dialogue of the day. It had a new emphasis upon the application of the gospel to the sociological, political, and economic areas of life.'

Separation is God's prescription for treating the disease of apostasy. It is not ours to repudiate, for it is a divine command, not a human idea. The doctrine of separatism gets its name from 2 Corinthians 6:17, 18.

'Wherefore come out from among them, and be ye separate, saith the Lord, and touch not the unclean thing; and I will receive you, and will be a Father unto you, and ye shall be my sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty.'

The same doctrine is taught in passages such as Ephesians 5:11 which says, "And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them." It is the theme of II John, culminating in verses 10 and 11:

'If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him God speed: For he that biddeth him God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.'

It is taught throughout the Scriptures, but it is very plain in passages such as I Kings 13, II Chronicles 19:2, Romans 16:17. II Thessalonians 3:6 and I Timothy 6:3-5. It is not my purpose to expound the doctrine of separation in this book. I have sought to do that in another booklet. Repudiation of separatism may sound acceptable until you realize that it is a repudiation of God's command about how to treat apostasy. In a much earlier press release dated December 8, 1957, Dr. Ockenga made the following statements:

'The New Evangelicalism has changed its strategy from one of separation to one of infiltration. Instead of static front battles, the new theological war is one of movement. Instead of attack upon error, the New Evangelicals proclaim the great historic doctrines of Christianity ...The strategy of the New Evangelicalism is the positive proclamation of truth in distinction from all errors without delving in personalities which embrace error.'

In a war, generals may change strategy, but that is not the prerogative of the Christian when God has given a command. Obviously separation is God's command, and infiltration is man's idea. The irenic statement above sounds rather noble in man's eyes. One can picture the new evangelical standing peacefully with hands folded far above the din of battle. But how does that square with Jude 3 and 4?

'Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto you, and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for the faith which was once delivered unto the saints. For there are certain men crept in unawares, who were before of old ordained to this condemnation, ungodly men, turning the grace of our God into lasciviousness, and denying the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ.'

What do you think of the new evangelical suggestion that we can proclaim truth "without delving in personalities which embrace error"? Throughout church history, heresies have always been identified with the men who perpetrated them. Almost every heresy of the past has been associated with a personality You cannot erase nineteen centuries of church history with a cute phrase. Certainly Dr. Ockenga was aware that the battle for the faith in the 1920's was between a Baptist unbeliever, Dr. Harry Emerson Fosdick, and Presbyterian believers. Did he believe that his brilliant teacher, Dr. J. Gresham Machen, should not have delved into the blasphemous statements of Dr. Fosdick in the First Presbyterian Church of New York City? The idea of preaching positively without contending for the faith is a compromise of Biblical truth."


THE MANIFESTO OF EVANGELICALISM

Source of this featured article:

Darrell Bock's Blog

Dr. Darrell Bock is Research Professor of New Testament Studies at Dallas Theological Seminary. He is an Editor at Large for Christianity Today and is a Past President of the Evangelical Theological Society (2000-2001). He is the author of over...

Billy Graham is an Alumni of Wheaton (see my article The Scales of Justice which illustrates in a simple, brief essay the religious humanism of neo-evangelicals). Please do not be taken in by the ambiguous term and the umbrella of contemporary, ecumenical EVANGELICAL tolerance (viz., NEUTRALISM/HUMANISM). I've never identified myself by this term, nor have I used it in any of my articles aside from this one. Jesus Christ did not carry around the contemporary baggage of an evangelical. He was an evangelist, which is a world apart from today's evangelicalism. The word evangelist only appears 3 times within the NT. The major occurance is Ephesians 4:11 which bears the meaning of a pioneer missionary who takes the message of God's saving grace to new regions. Scripture knows nothing of evangelicalism as defined in "The Manifesto of Evangelicalism" under discussion. More on this later.

Am I suggesting some type of retrogression? Of course not, eternal truth neither progresses beyond and outside of Scripture (as some would suggest; i.e., the Holy Trinity was always revealed in NT writing), nor does it fall out of fashion and develop new priorities.

Evangelicalism, without doubt, has control of the Christian forum in America. If someone suggests to you a gospel of self-improvement that does not have the living Jesus Christ as the central focus and means, run don't walk away from them.

If you haven't heard about Dr. Darrell Bock's blog articles at dts.org and bible.org concerning a "Manifesto of Evangelicalism" and an open invitation to sign-up with those who drafted this document, you will soon. It is destined to be the flavor of the month on all the Clear Channel Christian Radio stations.

The original posting that I followed was by Dr. Darrell Bock, titled "The Point of the Manifesto Put Simply May 08.08." It may be viewed @
http://blog.bible.org/bock/node/369#comment-8126

I first began to follow comments concerning this MANIFESTO at many blog sites on Pentecost Sunday.

In the spirit of a well rounded "gonzo journalism of grace" (an oxymoron, perhaps?) I direct the interested reader to 4 pre-dated "contrary view" articles.

Firstly, "Please Don't Call me an Evangelical" by Dr. C. Matthew MacMahon, @
http://www.apuritansmind.com/HistoricalTheology/McMahonDontCallMeEvangelical.htm

Secondly: "The Pelagian Captivity of the Church" by Dr. C. Matthew MacMahon @
http://www.apuritansmind.com/HistoricalTheology/McMahonPelagianCaptivity.htm

Thirdly, a chapter from, " New Neutralism II," titled "Institutions" by Dr. John Ashbrook. @
http://www.americanpresbyterianchurch.org/institutions.htm

And lastly, an excerpt from "New Neutralism II" @
www.crossroad.to/Excerpts/books/transformation/new-neutralism.htm

You will not be disappointed in the new perspective that will be gained through these articles.

More later and my regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave

_____________________

UPDATE 2 (5.15.08)

Dear Reader,

I posted the following comments at Bock's Blog "The Point of the Manifesto Put Simply May 8. 08" (http://blog.bible.org/bock/node/369) and received a courteous response from Dr. Bock each time. I don't agree with his take on the articles I suggested he read, but if you have read this article from the beginning you can see the background argument that I am making.

1) Definitions of "evangelical"
Submitted by gonzodave (not verified) on Sun, 2008-05-11 21:17.

Dear Dr. Bock,

I've followed with interest the many comments around the "blogosphere" concerning this MANIFESTO of Evangelicalism. Definitions about "isms" come and go.

I invite you and any interested party to take a look beyond the "in speak" of evangelicalism and read a fascinating and timely piece written by Dr. C. Matthew McMahon @
www.apuritansmind.com/HistoricalTheology/McMahonDontCallMeEvangelical.htm.

Regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave

1) Definition dlb
Submitted by bock on Mon, 2008-05-12 14:02.

Gonzodave:

Thanks for the post. Just a note. Anyone who writes that Carl Henry was against the evangelical movment does not understand its history at all. Henry edited the journal that has represetnted the movment for years. Its name: Chrsitianity Today. So I am not at all sure how accurate the post is.

dlb

2) More history of evangelicalism
Submitted by gonzodave (not verified) on Sun, 2008-05-11 22:14.

Dear Dr. Bock,

Post Note to my previous comment:

In the spirit of "ecumenicalism" and a well rounded view of of the ambiguous word - evangelicalism, I additional invite any interested person to read the article posted @
http://www.americanpresbyterianchurch.org/institutions.htm.

Regards in Christ,

gonzodave

2) More History dlb
Submitted by bock on Mon, 2008-05-12 14:07.

Gonzodave:

More of the same, thanks. Anyone who complains of Billy Graham today, suggesting he is liberal, really has an imbalanced spectrum. No one has presented the gospel clearly to more people in our time.

dlb

This writer:

Of course when the word gospel is used the language-game falls into play and what the speaker means by gospel is not necessarily that perceived by the listener. It just happens that I have a great article from my unpublished manuscript detailing "the gospel" in its varied aspects. I will post it first here in ChristiansUnite.com for my readers.

The latest posting for 5.13.08 concerning this topic at Dr. Darrell Bock's blog site may be found @
http://blog.bible.org/bock/node/371

For 5.14.08 see
Beliefnet Manifesto Feedback and the Under 30s May 14.08 (Revised May 15.08) @
http://blog.bible.org/bock/node/372

and the referenced weblog article at Beliefnet @
http://blog.beliefnet.com/castingstones/2008/05/the-evangelical-manifesto-a-ca.html?bt=polmashup

The document under discussion, The Manifesto of Evangelicalism, may be viewed @
http://www.evangelicalmanifesto.com

The full book "New Neutralism II" may be viewed chapter by chapter beginning @
http://www.americanpresbyterianchurch.org/foreword.htm

More later.

Regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave
________________________________

UPDATE 3 (5.16.08)

Dear Reader,

Straight from the official history of the National Association of Evangelicals which credits its origins to a Reverend J. Elvin Wright that associated with Dr. John Ockenga in Boston.

"When the younger Wright succeeded his father in 1929, he transformed First Fruits Harvesters into the New England Fellowship. Rather than continuing a ministry devoted to Pentecostal distinctives, the new fellowship would serve a broader constituency by operating a summer conference to inspire and bring together evangelicals of all stripes throughout New England. This was not his only change. In 1934 Wright became a Congregationalist, being received on profession of faith into the membership of Park Street Church in Boston. The new ecclesiastical commitment proved beneficial to the New England Fellowship, enhancing Wright's relationship with a number of emerging evangelical leaders, including one who would play a role in NAE, the Reverend Harold John Ockenga."

http://www.nae.net/index.cfm?FUSEACTION=nae.history

The NAE gives 1942 as its founding date. The above and other previous citations are to establish the contemporary aspect of neo-evangelicalism which was a spin-off from fundamentalist groups. Evangelicalism denies the biblical doctrine of separation from apostasy, yet, that was the origin of its beginnings and fundamentalist bear the brunt of their condemnation of sin - the sin of being unloving. This is illustrated in a recent comment concerning "The Manifesto of Evangelicalism" that reads:

"Fundamentalism not a part?
Submitted by MIKE (not verified) on Thu, 2008-05-15 20:19.

Upon reading the manifesto, I was delighted to see Evangelicals seeking to define themselves theologically. I believe too, the list of sins mentioned are extremely accurate too (ie. the entertainment, materialism, etc). One thing I do not understand is the stance against Fundamentalism. If Evangelicals are seeking to define themselves theologically, and Fundamentalists agree theologically with the manifesto's definition, would Fundamentalists not then be under the umbrella of "Evangelicals" too? The "liberals" were distinguished from Evangelicals based on theology yet the Fundamentalists were distinguished based on their practice (or sins). The manifesto mentioned the Fundamentalists' lack of forgiveness and love (p.9). These are horrible sins to be sure! Yet these are sins no greater than the ones listed by the Evangelicals themselves! Without doubt, Fundamentalists are in dire need of reforming and repenting themselves in these areas just as Evangelicals need to reform and repent of the areas they mentioned. It is my hope, that Evangelicals will accept their Fundamentalist brothers and sisters, even if the acceptance is not returned."

http://blog.bible.org/bock/node/369

A broad spectrum of comments regarding the question: "Evangelical Christians: who exactly are they?" (posted by Aris) may be read @
http://www.christiandiscussionforums.org/v/showthread.php?p=1683526#poststop

In the following citation of my comment at Bock's Blog, "me thinks I've been assassinated" by some very quick dance steps that were executed to leave me lagging behind. See what you think.

Response to my comment:

"More History dlb
Submitted by bock on Mon, 2008-05-12 14:07.

Gonzodave:

More of the same, thanks. Anyone who complains of Billy Graham today, suggesting he is liberal, really has an imbalanced spectrum. No one has presented the gospel clearly to more people in our time.

dlb"

My new comment to dlb's response:

"Your response to "More History
Submitted by gonzodave (not verified) on Thu, 2008-05-15 19:27.

Dear Dr. Bock,

Thank you for your courteous responses. However, concerning an "imbalanced spectrum" held by John E. Ashford in his book "Evangelicalism: The New Neutralism II" that he updated and revised in 1991 from his father's work of 1958 and 1975, I read in Eerdman's Handbook to Christianity in America on page 319:

"The social gospel differed from evangelical reform movements like the Salvation Army in at least two respects. First, it tended to emphasize structural reforms, changes in law, government policy, and the formal institutions of society. Second, it was firmly rooted in Protestant liberal theology."

Regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave

dlb's response to the comment above:

"More History dlb
Submitted by bock on Fri, 2008-05-16 07:27.

Gonzodave:

I think you missed my point. There is no social gospel when the work being affirmed is a reflection of spiritual commitments that grow out of the gospel. This is not merely an ethic we are discussing in that context (as the social gospel was and liberal theology often is), but a responses tied to the concept of being faithful to Jesus' call to live in a manner that honors God. In other words in this issue, the point does not remove the centrality or role of Jesus (In contrast to the social gosple which made his role one only of ethical guide). So this is precisely why we are not discussing the social gospel here but the living out of values rooted in Jesus' teaching and the call to be faithful to the gospel in terms of how we engage others. This is why the quote you give does not apply to what I am saying.

dlb"

http://blog.bible.org/bock/node/369

Now bear in mind, the above is in context with Dr. Bock's posting titled "The Point of the Manifesto Put Simply" in which he provides the following summary in 4 points:

"Jesus has much more to say about a whole host of issues than the ones that have been targeted over the last few decades, INCLUDING the ones that have been discussed and defended (sometimes very well, sometimes not so well). Does tone matter as well as content? I think so. To these questions the Manifesto also calls for reflection. What variety of factors are at stake in such an assessment? Among them are: (1) the well being of our society, (2) the authenticity of believers' claims to love God and one's neighbor, (3) the integration of those calls to love, as well as (4) the central importance evangelicals give to the need for spiritual transformation to really grow into human maturity, as individuals and as a society."

Maybe I'm slow to follow a highly regarded Professor of Spiritual Development and Culture at Dallas Theological Seminary who is a New York Times best selling author, but I read 2 of the 4 points addressing societal issues, as in a "social gospel" which is most assuredly a platform of evangelicalism that can be verified by many sources.

A short biography of AW Tozer at www.christiansunite.com

"In 1950 Tozer was elected editor of the Alliance Weekly now called Alliance Life. The circulation doubled almost immediately. In the first editorial dated June 3, 1950, he set the tone: 'It will cost something to walk slow in the parade of the ages while excited men of time rush about confusing motion with progress. But it will pay in the long run and the true Christian is not much interested in anything short of that.'"

I have read very carefully the MANIFESTO several times. If I am to take what Dr. Bock is asserting in his response, which is echoed in his many responses to comments about the MANIFESTO adding to the "culture war" and adding more mud to the water, I could be encouraged that this document is a turn toward a more fundamental view and away from a societal focus in Neo-Evangelicalism. I'll need to survey new comments and follow a few more articles before I am convinced.


More later and my regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave

______________________________

UPDATE #4 (5.24.08)

Dear Reader,

Unlike Neutralism II, Dr. Stanford mentions Dr. Okenga in his article as a possible candidate for the origins of neo-evangelism, but decides upon the heavy influence of Dr. Barnhouse, who stayed within the fundamental organization and "drop by drop" he spread compromise of the Cross in daily power for the Christian. In an article at http://withchrist.org/MJS/neoevan1.htm after detailing the history and current strength of the NAE (from which the Manifesto under discussion originates), Dr. Stanford includes this citation and summary of the character of neo-evangelism from section 1 of 3:

Dr. Donald Grey Barnhouse and Neo-Evangelicalism

Miles J. Stanford

"By both conviction and experience, Charles H. Spurgeon valued separation.

Numbers of our good brethren remain in fellowship with those who are undermining the Gospel, and they talk of their conduct as if it were a loving course which the Lord will approve in the day of His appearing. We cannot understand them.

The duty of a true believer towards men who profess to be Christians, and yet deny the Word of God and reject the Fundamentals of the Gospel, is to come out from among them. Complicity with error will take from the best of men the power to enter any successful protest against it. When will Christians learn that separation from evil is not only our privilege, but our bounden duty?

NEO-EVANGELICALISM SPAWNED -- During the 1940s there was a vast evacuation of believers from the ranks of the already separated Fundamentalist movement. There was a joining of minds and mood with Christians who had remained within the Liberal denominations, a "union" which finally resulted in the formation and growth of the National Association of Evangelicals.

Thus we have the emergence of the ecclesiastical hybrid, self-identified as Neo-evangelicalism. Initially Fundamental in its beliefs, but ecumenical in its bent--the anomaly of the separated inclusivists. Its strategy is to penetrate the Liberal denominations in the hope of regaining control for orthodoxy. It seeks to infiltrate with love, without making an issue of doctrinal error or attacking personalities who hold those errors. It has love for the Liberal; but it has very little love for the separated Fundamentalist brother in Christ.

FUNDAMENTAL "FAILURE" -- We should look for a moment at some of the basic characteristics of Neo-evangelicalism. The movement asserts that it separated from Fundamentalism because the latter is separatist, and therefore divisive. It also accuses Fundamentalism of being "obscurantist," "hypocritical," "anti-intellectual," "unloving,' "anti-science," etc.

The Neo-evangelical admits to being Fundamental in doctrine, but not fundamentalist in name. Call him anything but that! "There are thousands of Neo-evangelicals who would bristle at being termed Liberal. But they would bristle even more at being tagged Fundamentalists." "Do not call me a Fundamentalist. While I really do believe the great Fundamental truths of the Bible; still, I do not wish to be known as a Fundamentalist because the 'intellectuals' hate the term. I wish to be accredited."

LIBERAL LOATHING -- The Neo-evangelical also accuses the Fundamentalist of failure to win the Liberal and reclaim the denominations because of his "ill-reasoned" and "poorly-presented" Gospel. Conversely, Neo-evangelicalism would win the campaign by means of infiltration, intellectual approach, accommodation, and love.

It is true that naught can be accomplished apart from the Savior's love. But what Neo-evangelicalism fails to comprehend is that Liberalism does not reject the claims of Christianity because it is ill-reasoned or poorly presented, but because it is Christianity! Neither does it accept Christianity when it is intellectually reasoned and proudly presented.

THE CROSSLESS CHRISTIAN -- Even if all of his accusations were true of the Fundamentalist--and some of them are--the truth is that the Neo-evangelical cannot bear to be looked down upon. He will avoid stigma at any cost, and he will seek recognition at any price. His thinking is that if he can gain the respect and approbation of the religious and secular worlds, he will thereby gain a hearing.

However, fear of the stigma of being known as a Fundamentalist, plus fearlessness of acceptance by the Liberal, add up to Neo-evangelicalism's avoidance of the Cross concerning intellect and reputation, if nothing more. What we should all realize is that "the world's frown is comparatively powerless; it is its favor that we have most to fear." Dr. Vance Havner once observed, "The devil goes about as a roaring lion, but he does far more harm as an angel of light."

LEADERS LEACHED -- The Neo-evangelical movement was originally marshaled and directed, mainly under the aegis of the National Association of Evangelicals, by such well-known leaders as Dr. Harold Ockenga, Dr. Carl Henry, Dr. Billy Graham, and Dr. Donald Barnhouse, to mention but a few. If Dr. Ockenga is considered to be the father of the movement, Dr. Barnhouse could certainly be considered its "mother."

The shame is that while Liberal denominations made great gain of Dr. Barnhouse, the same penetrated combine manages to make immeasurable gain by means of manipulating one Dr. Billy Graham. A leader of the World Council of Churches has boasted, "We are using him to build our churches."

Yes, infiltrate, accommodate, stay in--and be won instead of win! This is exactly what happened to Dr. Barnhouse, to name but one among all too many. The penetrator is himself penetrated. Let the would-be infiltrator beware! If it can happen to these giants, what makes you impervious? "While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption; for of whom a man is overcome, of the same is he brought in bondage" (2 Peter 2:19)."

In closing I offer a fine "classic" sermon presented by the highly regarded A. W. Tozer concerning the denial of the diety of the Holy Spirit by neo-evangelicals. It is a free to listen MP3 @ http://www.oneplace.com/ministries/A_W_Tozer/archives.asp?bcd=2005-12

My regards in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave




David Coulon 2007-2008
Creative Commons 3.0 copyrighted by David Coulon 2008. Use with credit.

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

Another Layman Committed To The Informed Sharing Of God's Graceful Salvation

Mr. Jonathan E. Mason, an English layman, has posted an excellent six part series concerning the "rationalized" Arminian objections that are raised against the doctrine of imputation and penal satisfaction (which are the biblical guarantee of salvation).

I highly recommend this series to be an excellent read for the average interested individual.

http://jonathanemason.wordpress.com

Additional, more detailed reading of the underlying Greek and Hebrew Scripture by Thomas J. Ascol on imputation and justification may be read in the Founders Journal #59, at:

http://www.founders.org/FJ59/editorial.html

Where, John Bunyan is quoted as saying:

One day as I was passing into the field…this sentence fell upon my soul. Thy righteousness is in heaven. And me thought, withal, I saw with the eyes of my soul Jesus Christ at God’s right hand; there, I say, was my righteousness; so that wherever I was, or whatever I was doing, God could not say of me, he wants [=lacks] my righteousness, for that was just [in front of] him. I also saw, moreover, that it was not my good frame of heart that made my righteousness better, nor yet my bad frame that made my righteousness worse, for my righteousness was Jesus Christ himself, “The same yesterday, today and, and forever.” …

Now did my chains fall off my legs indeed. I was loosed from my afflictions and irons; my temptations also fled away; so that from that time those dreadful scriptures of God [e.g. Hebrews 12:16 –17] left off to trouble me; now went I also home rejoicing for the grace and love of God.[14]


I hope you enjoy learning about God's grace in Christ Jesus,

gonzodave

Monday, April 7, 2008

God Save Me From Your Followers!

by gonzodave


Savior -
Of my life,
You pipe a dirge,
They hear a jig.
They sing they didn't,
They da-nce they did.
To glo-ry and pra-nce,
the awful dance of the wicked!
The re-sur-rect-ed Christ denied and slain,
by his fol-low-ers with His Name.
A glorified body does not bleed,
Christ is dead just the same.
The crime is hid-den!
So who's to blame?
So who's to know,
before they go?
We keep law!
to feed His,
sheep.


* Excerpted from an article titled, "Thus May We Gather Honey From the Weed."



David Coulon 2008. Use with credit.
___________________________________

Wednesday, April 2, 2008

Can The Arminian Gospel of Salvation Still Be Christian Without Imputation ?

by gonzodave

The via moderna (the modern way), credited to William of Ockham, was a Catholic, pre-reformation axiom of “facienti quod in se est Deus non denegat gratiam” – “God will not deny grace to the man who does his best.” This was viewed as a pactum, or covenant between man and God, where grace enables man to play a role in his justification, but without falling into Pelagianism (a side-step at best). The via moderna was rejected by Martin Luther in his teachings on justification.

Whether it be the substitutionary penal satisfaction in the value credited to the death of Christ, or the biblical doctrine of the imputation of the righteousness of Christ to the believer, the Arminian denies both. The so-called Protestant, Arminian theology (e.g., the semi-Pelagian Governmental theory of atonement) denies every bit and wit of biblical "imputation." Mr. Bryan Maes has posted the following citation at his blog site:








http://bryanmaes.com/2008/03/31/nevin-on-imputation/

Do we then discard the doctrine of imputation, as maintained by the orthodox theology in opposition to the vain talk of the Pelagians? By no means. We seek only to establish the doctrine; for without it, most assuredly, the whole structure of Christianity must give way. It is only when placed on false ground that it becomes untenable in the way now stated… The Bible knows nothing of a simply outward imputation, by which something is reckoned to a man that does not belong to him in fact… The scriptures make two cases, in this respect, fully parallel. We are justified freely by God, on the ground of what Christ has done and suffered in our room and stead. His righteousness is imputed to us, set over to our account, regarded as our own. But here again the relation in law, supposes and shows a corresponding relation in life. The forensic declaration by which the sinner is pronounced free from guilt, is like that word in the beginning when God said let there be light, and light was. It not only proclaims him righteous for Christ’s sake, but sets the righteousness of Christ in him as part of his own life.

- John Williamson Nevin, The Mystical Presence (Wipf and Stock, 180)

Tuesday, April 1, 2008

"Overcoming Sin and Temptation" by John Owen

by gonzodave


RECOMMENDED READING

In my travels across the Internet, I stumbled upon the following links. This modern rendering of the classic works of John Owen is available for on-line reading (I have no connection to the purchase of this book).

The location is: Overcoming Sin and Temptation - John Owen, Kelly M. Kapic (Editor), Justin Taylor (Editor) www.gnpcb.org/product/1581346492

The contents may be accessed at:
http://www.gnpcb.org/product/1581346492/contents#extra

by clicking the following link: Contents

Friday, March 21, 2008

The Judgment of John Miley

by gonzodave


The following is my Good Friday posting on why that historical day was - a good day. Enjoy the Easter weekend; but most of all, thank God our Savior, Christ Jesus, for His finished work on the cross and His graceful salvation.

PREFACE

“The Necessity for Atonement”

First of all, penalty, as an element of law, appeals to an instinctive fear. Far better is it that evil tendencies should be restrained, and outward conformity to law secured, through such fear than not at all. We therefore hold all divine punishment to have a strictly rectoral function. Punishment is the resource of all righteous government. The whole change in the divine economy is this – that on the sole ground of the vicarious sacrifice of Christ all who repent and believe may be forgiven and saved. i

Dr. John Miley,
Arminian humanist theologian
Grounded in the extra-biblical Governmental or Rectoral theory of atonement

"The Necessity for At-one-ment”

God has never proposed the amendment of sinners now, nor will He in eternity. He has provided at infinite cost a perfect regeneration and new creation through faith in Christ. This may be received or rejected by men. ii

Dr. Lewis Sperry Chafer,
Grace of God theologian
Grounded in the completed Penal Satisfaction value in the death of Christ

On Judgment Day this writer will stand along side Jesus Christ because I believe He died for my all my human weaknesses. He, not I, saved me from His judgment. The professing Christians, the tares among the wheat, will stand in front of Jesus because they are unsaved, unregenerated, and unable to grasp this spiritual truth.

The only "easy believism" is that which Satan can grasp. Satan thinks like a man; but much more to the point all unsaved men think like Satan who is "the god of this world (kosmos=world systems and organizations)." Those who adhere to a so-called Protestant system of theology in which they assume a future judgment to be based upon their moral strengths and accomplishments are woefully mistaken.

Noah "found grace" with God completely aside from the fact that he preached salvation for 120 years without converting a single soul to God's way of thinking. Noah simply believed what God said - and he was saved in spite of his drunkeness. Noah built the ark, yes, but God was the architect of the floating zoo and filled it with animals. God knows who has passage on the ark of salvation before He ever built the "ark of Christ."

Not "good people," but only those who are able to believe in His "good news" will be conformed into "the image of Christ " and saved from His judgment. A judgment that will fall only on those who reject Him for salvation. To bank on yourself for continued salvation is to not ever have heard the gospel of God's saving grace and believed in the first place. To believe in Christ as a Lord who smiles upon your efforts at reformation is the same as rejecting the sufficiency of the blood of Christ for supranatural divine transformation at the moment of saving faith.


THE MANIFESTO OF THE BELIEVER'S ASSURANCE "IN CHRIST" NOT SELF


Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. 8:2 For the law of the life-giving Spirit in Christ Jesus has set you free from the law of sin and death. 8:3 For God achieved what the law could not do because it was weakened through the flesh. By sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh and concerning sin, he condemned sin in the flesh, 8:4 so that the righteous requirement of the law may be fulfilled in us, who do not walk according to the flesh but according to the Spirit.

8:5 For those who live according to the flesh have their outlook shaped by the things of the flesh, but those who live according to the Spirit have their outlook shaped by the things of the Spirit. 8:6 For the outlook of the flesh is death, but the outlook of the Spirit is life and peace, 8:7 because the outlook of the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to the law of God, nor is it able to do so. 8:8 Those who are in the flesh cannot please God. 8:9 You, however, are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if indeed the Spirit of God lives in you. Now if anyone does not have the Spirit of Christ, this person does not belong to him. 8:10 But if Christ is in you, your body is dead because of sin, but the Spirit is your life because of righteousness. 8:11 Moreover if the Spirit of the one who raised Jesus from the dead lives in you, the one who raised Christ from the dead will also make your mortal bodies alive through his Spirit who lives in you. NET


The Final Judgment of the Lost





The Great White Throne


"The heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men ... [when] the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up. Then I saw a large white throne and the one who was seated on it; the earth and the heaven fled from his presence, and no place was found for them. And I saw the dead, the great and the small, standing before the throne. Then books were opened, and another book was opened-the book of life. So the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to their deeds. The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and Death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each one was judged according to his deeds. Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death-the lake of fire. If anyone's name was not found written in the book of life, that person was thrown into the lake of fire."

The Great White Throne and the Judgment of Works

Dr. Lewis Chafer:

"At the end of the thousand years [the millennium] this the last and all inclusive resurrection will take place. The number of those to be resurrected is incomprehensible. It is estimated that for every living person now on the earth at least one hundred have died and been buried. So far from being "the land of the living," strictly speaking, earth is now the greatest cemetery that that could ever be conceived. It is out of this state of bodily death that the dead will rise to judgment. Their resurrection serves to bring all of remaining humanity before God in judgment and to prepare them for their conscious destiny in the lake of fire. The books are opened and men are judged according to their works. It will be remembered that in all ages - men have been under the inherent law or obligation to satisfy the design and purpose of their Creator. The believer has been perfected before God forever and therefore answers in his Christ-wrought perfection every demand of God upon him. In the present age, however, men are condemned not only for their unholy estate, but on the ground of their failure to respond to divine grace as it is offered them in Christ. At the present time evil works are wholly climaxed through an attitude of unbelief toward the Redeemer. The Lamb's book of life is opened - evidently to demonstrate that no mistake has been made; for there will be none present whose names are written in that book. God's irrevocable answer to human sin is the lake of fire, which is the second death. He may save men from it only as a Substitute answers the holy demands made of them and they receive that Provision for them. Too often men are blinded by the awfulness of this divine judgment against sin and contend that, since God is love, He will not finally execute all that is here predicted; but be it said again that, if God could save even one lost soul on the ground of His compassion apart from the righteous judgments wrought out by Christ in His death, He could save all lost souls by mere compassion, in which case the death of Christ becomes not only needless, but the greatest blunder of the universe. The glorious truth which needs ever to be proclaimed is that lost souls may be saved, which truth is good news indeed, but they may be saved only in and through Christ. Apart from Christ as Savior, there is no salvation. Even infinite wisdom, power, and love can provide no other escape from the holy judgments of God against sin. What God may do with those who die having never heard the gospel is not revealed, nor could it be revealed. The Scriptures present the unevangelized as wholly lost. Their estate is the impelling call to missionary endeavor. If men might be saved by their ignorance of the gospel, it were well never to take the gospel to them lest, being enlightened, they reject the message and come to be lost forever. Christians being instant in season and out of season are to present this gospel to all who are yet living on the earth. This judgment scene lends no support to the fancy that men who reject Christ in this life will have another chance in realms beyond death. The unsaved remain what they were when death intervened and until they stand thus before God's great white throne to be judged according to their works."

This writer:

For the Christian, faith and hope is swallowed up in seeing God and only love remains. For the unsaved, death and the corporeal conviction that death is the end will be swallowed up in seeing God. When only an endless waiting will remain - not death, or extinction.

Time is a construction and creation of God. Death as a curse encompasses the triple aspects of the physical, the spiritual, and the eternal. In the light of the revealed truth of God's Word, death and the word wait become synonyms: "n (plural waits) time spent waiting: a period of time spent while expecting something to happen. The wait seemed to go on forever." Death, as ordained by God, when fully comprehended, may only be seen as an ad interim instrument of God. Death comes full circle from the Fall of Adam in Genesis to the abolishment of death in Revelation.

Understood as such, death becomes a divinely decreed state of waiting. In this age, God, who himself is not bound by time, permissively "waits" upon the living to "obey the gospel of the grace of God." The redeemed wait until they are released from the flesh of Adam and the sin nature and, the time of completion when they are clothed in the same glorified body as Christ their Savior. As a result of Adam's sin, those who die without accepting the gift of forgiveness, eternal life, and the righteousness of Christ must await sentencing when their full measure of torment in the eternal damnation of the second death [wait] is determined by Christ:

"In dying [waiting] thou shalt die [wait]" (Gen 2:17, literal Hebrew translation).

That which follows is a dramatized account of a most real future Judgment of the lost and their works.

The Judgment of John Miley




I will see you sooner or later, either nearby among the crowds of the blessed elect or at a distance. If at a distance - when a cold chill runs down my back - as my eyes find you naked in your evil and stripped of all borrowed goodness. Standing alone and clothed in a resurrected body fit for a criminal. Alone and small in front of a high, gleaming, glistening Great White Throne that shines with the glory of Christ Jesus seated in Judgment. Jesus the King of kings and the Lord of lords with an Iron Rod in His fist. I watch as you bend your knee and confess that Jesus is Lord. He then cries out loudly, to the ends of Heaven, "I never knew you! Be gone from Me, you lawbreaker!"

Thus, openly confirming the record of your self-excluding sin in rejecting Him as the all sufficient Substitute for your rebellion and the Master of your destiny. The attending angel blots out your name from the Book of Life. Another angel then reads off your unforgiven acts in unbelief and calls out each of the light filled occasions in your darkened life when the Holy Spirit witnessed through Saints the truth of the Gospel of the Grace of God that saves eternally.

Cathedral Frescoes

Then, at the Throne, Heaven shrinks - and the degree of eternal anguish assigned to your fate, when announced by the King, becomes like a terrible judgment in a small room. On one side of the Throne the redeemed Saints of Heaven in unison, in multitudes, sing His praises in the minor chords of sorrow, the never to be told agonies only the glorified God-Man knows full well. Chords of sound from the natural world that He created. Chords the Saints learned in earthly sorrow. On the opposite side of the Throne, the Angels recite His praises in a host after host of ten thousand. Now, in a sustained thunderclap of accord, the singing Saints and the reciting Angels repeat the three line phrase, "Holy! Holy! Holy! - Holy! Holy! Holy! - Worthy is the Lamb that was slain!"

You stand erect, not bowed, your shoulders braced against your heaving sobs. During the thousand years or more that you spent with the condemned followers of religion, open rebels, and the lost from previous ages who were waiting on this day, you gained perfect recall and know your greatest sin was to spread the gospel of death, "for what seems right to a man but the end thereof is death." Truth has pierced through to your very soul. You know that there is no higher Judge, there is no redemption for those who did not trust the One who was the Death of death for a forfeit life that now is yours to bear for all eternity. As you hear your own Requiem of Damnation, a river of regret, that Mercy can never answer, streams from your eyes and flows down the curves and hollows of your naked body of shame - then disappears into the dry stones you stand on. These, your last tears for all eternity.

Silently, in great reluctance, I see Christ pour your unclaimed eternal life in the Church, His Body, slowly into the bowl of the unredeemed, back into the sea of the lost. The life He exchanged for His Blood at the Cross, the exchange of His infinite capacity to suffer separation from His Father for your limited capacity to suffer separation from Him - for all eternity. The portion made out to His glory. It was never your portion. It was His gift with your name on it, a gift waiting for you to claim with your trust. The twenty-four elders enter and surround you, each in turn says, "So be it." The last Amen over your soul. An Angel reads, "Close the Book, put out the Candle, ring the Bell." Another Angel closes the Book, the Light leaves the Throne, and a double note Bell tolls three times. Six notes for the mark of a man with no Christ for a Savior.

A Saint and an Angel from your life step out from the witnessing Host of Heaven. A loved one who prayed for your salvation, and a familiar face sent by Jesus to warn you. They lift you, first your weight, then themselves and carry you from the darkened Throne and then across the Gulf of Perdition to your final destination of endless, fruitless repentance. Where unrelieved torment, not torture, has been gauged to your degree of rebellion and this the worm that never dies - your eternal memory of the unforgiven sin that separates you from the Love that is life in Jesus Christ.

There in Ghenna, the final destination of the Darkness of Judgment, the Everlasting Lake of Fire, in solitude your soul will live a Second Death for all eternity, in waiting you will wait, in separation you will be separated, until the everlasting ages of the ages. In your willing self-confident religion of rejection you chose the fate of Satan. Satan, that ancient Serpent who strove in countless ways to deceive as many as would refuse an eternal salvation in the Light of the Righteousness of Christ Jesus. His deception, your rejection, has led you into the final reality and personal responsibility of the truth of the just curse of the Fall-

"The soul that sins shall surely die [wait in separation from the love of Christ for all eternity]."

_____________________________

Epilogue

The unsurpassed 267 year old, Colonial American sermon given by Jonathan Edwards is presented here in an unabridged public domain copy downloaded from www.whatsaiththescripture.com




Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God
Johnathan Edwards


Enfield, Connecticut
July 8, 1741


"Their foot shall slide in due time" (Deuteronomy 32:35).

In this verse is threatened the vengeance of God on the wicked unbelieving Israelites, who were God's visible people, and who lived under the means of grace; but who, notwithstanding all God's wonderful works towards them, remained (as vers 28.) void of counsel, having no understanding in them. Under all the cultivations of heaven, they brought forth bitter and poisonous fruit; as in the two verses next preceding the text. -- The expression I have chosen for my text, their foot shall slide in due time, seems to imply the following things, relating to the punishment and destruction to which these wicked Israelites were exposed.

1. That they were always exposed to destruction; as one that stands or walks in slippery places is always exposed to fall. This is implied in the manner of their destruction coming upon them, being represented by their foot sliding. The same is expressed, Psalm 72:18. "Surely thou didst set them in slippery places; thou castedst them down into destruction."

2. It implies, that they were always exposed to sudden unexpected destruction. As he that walks in slippery places is every moment liable to fall, he cannot foresee one moment whether he shall stand or fall the next; and when he does fall, he falls at once without warning: Which is also expressed in Psalm 73:18,19. "Surely thou didst set them in slippery places; thou castedst them down into destruction: How are they brought into desolation as in a moment!"

3. Another thing implied is, that they are liable to fall of themselves, without being thrown down by the hand of another; as he that stands or walks on slippery ground needs nothing but his own weight to throw him down.

4. That the reason why they are not fallen already and do not fall now is only that God's appointed time is not come. For it is said, that when that due time, or appointed time comes, their foot shall slide. Then they shall be left to fall, as they are inclined by their own weight. God will not hold them up in these slippery places any longer, but will let them go; and then, at that very instant, they shall fall into destruction; as he that stands on such slippery declining ground, on the edge of a pit, he cannot stand alone, when he is let go he immediately falls and is lost.

The observation from the words that I would now insist upon is this. -- "There is nothing that keeps wicked men at any one moment out of hell, but the mere pleasure of God." -- By the mere pleasure of God, I mean his sovereign pleasure, his arbitrary will, restrained by no obligation, hindered by no manner of difficulty, any more than if nothing else but God's mere will had in the least degree, or in any respect whatsoever, any hand in the preservation of wicked men one moment. -- The truth of this observation may appear by the following considerations.

1. There is no want of power in God to cast wicked men into hell at any moment. Men's hands cannot be strong when God rises up. The strongest have no power to resist him, nor can any deliver out of his hands. -- He is not only able to cast wicked men into hell, but he can most easily do it. Sometimes an earthly prince meets with a great deal of difficulty to subdue a rebel, who has found means to fortify himself, and has made himself strong by the numbers of his followers. But it is not so with God. There is no fortress that is any defence from the power of God. Though hand join in hand, and vast multitudes of God's enemies combine and associate themselves, they are easily broken in pieces. They are as great heaps of light chaff before the whirlwind; or large quantities of dry stubble before devouring flames. We find it easy to tread on and crush a worm that we see crawling on the earth; so it is easy for us to cut or singe a slender thread that any thing hangs by: thus easy is it for God, when he pleases, to cast his enemies down to hell. What are we, that we should think to stand before him, at whose rebuke the earth trembles, and before whom the rocks are thrown down?

2. They deserve to be cast into hell; so that divine justice never stands in the way, it makes no objection against God's using his power at any moment to destroy them. Yea, on the contrary, justice calls aloud for an infinite punishment of their sins. Divine justice says of the tree that brings forth such grapes of Sodom, "Cut it down, why cumbereth it the ground?" Luke 13:7. The sword of divine justice is every moment brandished over their heads, and it is nothing but the hand of arbitrary mercy, and God's mere will, that holds it back.

3. They are already under a sentence of condemnation to hell. They do not only justly deserve to be cast down thither, but the sentence of the law of God, that eternal and immutable rule of righteousness that God has fixed between him and mankind, is gone out against them, and stands against them; so that they are bound over already to hell. John 3:18. "He that believeth not is condemned already." So that every unconverted man properly belongs to hell; that is his place; from thence he is, John 8:23. "Ye are from beneath:" And thither he is bound; it is the place that justice, and God's word, and the sentence of his unchangeable law assign to him.

4. They are now the objects of that very same anger and wrath of God, that is expressed in the torments of hell. And the reason why they do not go down to hell at each moment, is not because God, in whose power they are, is not then very angry with them; as he is with many miserable creatures now tormented in hell, who there feel and bear the fierceness of his wrath. Yea, God is a great deal more angry with great numbers that are now on earth: yea, doubtless, with many that are now in this congregation, who it may be are at ease, than he is with many of those who are now in the flames of hell.

So that it is not because God is unmindful of their wickedness, and does not resent it, that he does not let loose his hand and cut them off. God is not altogether such an one as themselves, though they may imagine him to be so. The wrath of God bums against them, their damnation does not slumber; the pit is prepared, the fire is made ready, the fumace is now hot, ready to receive them; the flames do now rage and glow. The glittering sword is whet, and held over them, and the pit hath opened its mouth under them.

5. The devil stands ready to fall upon them, and seize them as his own, at what moment God shall permit him. They belong to him; he has their souls in his possession, and under his dominion. The scripture represents them as his goods, Luke 11:12. The devils watch them; they are ever by them at their right hand; they stand waiting for them, like greedy hungry lions that see their prey, and expect to have it, but are for the present kept back. If God should withdraw his hand, by which they are restrained, they would in one moment fly upon their poor souls. The old serpent is gaping for them; hell opens its mouth wide to receive them; and if God should permit it, they would be hastily swallowed up and lost.

6. There are in the souls of wicked men those hellish principles reigning, that would presently kindle and flame out into hell fire, if it were not for God's restraints. There is laid in the very nature of carnal men, a foundation for the torments of hell. There are those corrupt principles, in reigning power in them, and in full possession of them, that are seeds of hell fire. These principles are active and powerful, exceeding violent in their nature, and if it were not for the restraining hand of God upon them, they would soon break out, they would flame out after the same manner as the same corruptions, the same enmity does in the hearts of damned souls, and would beget the same torments as they do in them. The souls of the wicked are in scripture compared to the troubled sea, Isa. 57:20. For the present, God restrains their wickedness by his mighty power, as he does the raging waves of the troubled sea, saying, "Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further;" but if God should withdraw that restraining power, it would soon carry all before it. Sin is the ruin and misery of the soul; it is destructive in its nature; and if God should leave it without restraint, there would need nothing else to make the soul perfectly miserable. The corruption of the heart of man is immoderate and boundless in its fury; and while wicked me live here, it is like fire pent up by God's restraints, whereas if it were let loose, it would set on fire the course of nature; and as the heart is now a sink of sin, so if sin was not restrained, it would immediately turn the soul into fiery oven, or a furnace of fire and brimstone.

7. It is no security to wicked men for one moment, that there are no visible means of death at hand. It is no security to a natural man, that he is now in health, and that he does not see which way he should now immediately go out of the world by any accident, and that there is no visible danger in any respect in his circumstances. The manifold and continual experience of the world in all ages, shows this is no evidence, that a man is not on the very brink of eternity, and that the next step will not be into another world. The unseen, unthought-of ways and means of persons going suddenly out of the world are innumerable and inconceivable. Unconverted men walk over the pit of hell on a rotten covering, and there are innumerable places in this covering so weak that they will not bear their weight, and these places are not seen. The arrows of death fly unseen at noon-day; the sharpest sight cannot discem them. God has so many different unsearchable ways of taking wicked men out of the world and sending them to hell, that there is nothing to make it appear, that God had need to be at the expense of a miracle, or go out of the ordinary course of his providence, to destroy any wicked man, at any moment. All the means that there are of sinners going out of the world, are so in God's hands, and so universally and absolutely subject to his power and determination, that it does not depend at all the less on the mere will of God, whether sinners shall at any moment go to hell, than if means were never made use of, or at all concerned in the case.

8. Natural men's prudence and care to preserve their own lives, or the care of others to preserve them, do not secure them a moment. To this, divine providence and universal experience do also bear testimony. There is this clear evidence that men's own wisdom is no security to them from death; that if it were otherwise we should see some difference between the wise and politic men of the world, and others, with regard to their liableness to early and unexpected death: but how is it in fact? Eccles. 2:16. "How dieth the wise man? even as the fool."

9. All wicked men's pains and contrivande which they use to escape hell, while they continue to reject Christ, and so remain wicked men, do not secure them from hell one moment. Almost every natural man that hears of hell, flatters himself that he shall escape it; he depends upon himself for his own security; he flatters himself in what he has done, in what he is now doing, or what he intends to do. Every one lays out matters in his own mind how he shall avoid damnation, and flatters himself that he contrives well for himself, and that his schemes will not fail. They hear indeed that there are but few saved, and that the greater part of men that have died heretofore are gone to hell; but each one imagines that he lays out matters better for his own escape than others have done. He does not intend to come to that place of torment; he says within himself, that he intends to take effectual care, and to order matters so for himself as not to fail.

But the foolish children of men miserably delude themselves in their own schemes, and in confidence in their own strength and wisdom; they trust to nothing but a shadow. The greater part of those who heretofore have lived under the same means of grace, and are now dead, are undoubtedly gone to hell; and it was not because they were not as wise as those who are now alive: it was not because they did not lay out matters as well for themselves to secure their own escape. If we could speak with them, and inquire of them, one by one, whether they expected, when alive, and when they used to hear about hell, ever to be the subjects of misery: we doubtless, should hear one and another reply, "No, I never intended to come here: I had laid out matters otherwise in my mind; I thought I should contrive well for myself -- I thought my scheme good. I intended to take effectual care; but it came upon me unexpected; I did not look for it at that time, and in that manner; it came as a thief -- Death outwitted me: God's wrath was too quick for me. Oh, my cursed foolishness! I was flattering myself, and pleasing myself with vain dreams of what I would do hereafter; and when I was saying, Peace and safety, then sudden destruction came upon me."

10. God has laid himself under no obligation, by any promise to keep any natural man out of hell one moment. God certainly has made no promises either of eternal life, or of any deliverance or preservation from eternal death, but what are contained in the covenant of grace, the promises that are given in Christ, in whom all the promises are yea and amen. But surely they have no interest in the promises of the covenant of grace who are not the children of the covenant, who do not believe in any of the promises, and have no interest in the Mediator of the covenant.

So that, whatever some have imagined and pretended about promises made to natural men's earnest seeking and knocking, it is plain and manifest, that whatever pains a natural man takes in religion, whatever prayers he makes, till he believes in Christ, God is under no manner of obligation to keep him a moment from eternal destruction.

So that, thus it is that natural men are held in the hand of God, over the pit of hell; they have deserved the fiery pit, and are already sentenced to it; and God is dreadfully provoked, his anger is as great towards them as to those that are actually suffering the executions of the fierceness of his wrath in hell, and they have done nothing in the least to appease or abate that anger, neither is God in the least bound by any promise to hold them up one moment; the devil is waiting for them, hell is gaping for them, the flames gather and flash about them, and would fain lay hold on them, and swallow them up; the fire pent up in their own hearts is struggling to break out: and they have no interest in any Mediator, there are no means within reach that can be any security to them. In short, they have no refuge, nothing to take hold of; all that preserves them every moment is the mere arbitrary will, and uncovenanted, unobliged forbearance of an incensed God.

Application

The use of this awful subject may be for awakening unconverted persons in this congregation. This that you have heard is the case of every one of you that are out of Christ. -- That world of misery, that take of burning brimstone, is extended abroad under you. There is the dreadful pit of the glowing flames of the wrath of God; there is hell's wide gaping mouth open; and you have nothing to stand upon, nor any thing to take hold of; there is nothing between you and hell but the air; it is only the power and mere pleasure of God that holds you up.

You probably are not sensible of this; you find you are kept out of hell, but do not see the hand of God in it; but look at other things, as the good state of your bodily constitution, your care of your own life, and the means you use for your own preservation. But indeed these things are nothing; if God should withdraw his hand, they would avail no more to keep you from falling, than the thin air to hold up a person that is suspended in it.

Your wickedness makes you as it were heavy as lead, and to tend downwards with great weight and pressure towards hell; and if God should let you go, you would immediately sink and swiftly descend and plunge into the bottomless gulf, and your healthy constitution, and your own care and prudence, and best contrivance, and all your righteousness, would have no more influence to uphold you and keep you out of hell, than a spider's web would have to stop a falling rock. Were it not for the sovereign pleasure of God, the earth would not bear you one moment; for you are a burden to it; the creation groans with you; the creature is made subject to the bondage of your corruption, not willingly; the sun does not willingly shine upon you to give you light to serve sin and Satan; the earth does not willingly yield her increase to satisfy your lusts; nor is it willingly a stage for your wickedness to be acted upon; the air does not willingly serve you for breath to maintain the flame of life in your vitals, while you spend your life in the service of God's enemies. God's creatures are good, and were made for men to serve God with, and do not willingly subserve to any other purpose, and groan when they are abused to purposes so directly contrary to their nature and end. And the world would spew you out, were it not for the sovereign hand of him who hath subjected it in hope. There are the black clouds of God's wrath now hanging directly over your heads, full of the dreadful storm, and big with thunder; and were it not for the restraining hand of God, it would immediately burst forth upon you. The sovereign pleasure of God, for the present, stays his rough wind; otherwise it would come with fury, and your destruction would come like a whirlwind, and you would be like the chaff of the summer threshing floor.

The wrath of God is like great waters that are dammed for the present; they increase more and more, and rise higher and higher, till an outlet is given; and the longer the stream is stopped, the more rapid and mighty is its course, when once it is let loose. It is true, that judgment against your evil works has not been executed hitherto; the floods of God's vengeance have been withheld; but your guilt in the mean time is constantly increasing, and you are every day treasuring up more wrath; the waters are constantly rising, and waxing more and more mighty; and there is nothing but the mere pleasure of God, that holds the waters back, that are unwilling to be stopped, and press hard to go forward. If God should only withdraw his hand from the flood-gate, it would immediately fly open, and the fiery floods of the fierceness and wrath of God, would rush forth with inconceivable fury, and would come upon you with omnipotent power; and if your strength were ten thousand times greater than it is, yea, ten thousand times greater than the strength of the stoutest, sturdiest devil in hell, it would be nothing to withstand or endure it.
The bow of God's wrath is bent, and the arrow made ready on the string, and justice bends the arrow at your heart, and strains the bow, and it is nothing but the mere pleasure of God, and that of an angry God, without any promise or obligation at all, that keeps the arrow one moment from being made drunk with your blood. Thus all you that never passed under a great change of heart, by the mighty power of the Spirit of God upon your souls; all you that were never born again, and made new creatures, and raised from being dead in sin, to a state of new, and before altogether unexperienced light and life, are in the hands of an angry God. However you may have reformed your life in many things, and may have had religious affections, and may keep up a form of religion in your families and closets, and in the house of God, it is nothing but his mere pleasure that keeps you from being this moment swallowed up in everlasting destruction. However unconvinced you may now be of the truth of what you hear, by and by you will be fully convinced of it. Those that are gone from being in the like circumstances with you, see that it was so with them; for destruction came suddenly upon most of them; when they expected nothing of it, and while they were saying, Peace and safety: now they see, that those things on which they depended for peace and safety, were nothing but thin air and empty shadows.

The God that holds you over the pit of hell, much as one holds a spider, or some loathsome insect over the fire, abhors you, and is dreadfully provoked: his wrath towards you burns like fire; he looks upon you as worthy of nothing else, but to be cast into the fire; he is of purer eyes than to bear to have you in his sight; you are ten thousand times more abominable in his eyes, than the most hateful venomous serpent is in ours. You have offended him infinitely more than ever a stubborn rebel did his prince; and yet it is nothing but his hand that holds you from falling into the fire every moment. It is to be ascribed to nothing else, that you did not go to hell the last night; that you was suffered to awake again in this world, after you closed your eyes to sleep. And there is no other reason to be given, why you have not dropped into hell since you arose in the morning, but that God's hand has held you up. There is no other reason to be given why you have not gone to hell, since you have sat here in the house of God, provoking his pure eyes by your sinful wicked manner of attending his solemn worship. Yea, there is nothing else that is to be given as a reason why you do not this very moment drop down into hell.

O sinner! Consider the fearful danger you are in: it is a great furnace of wrath, a wide and bottomless pit, full of the fire of wrath, that you are held over in the hand of that God, whose wrath is provoked and incensed as much against you, as against many of the damned in hell. You hang by a slender thread, with the flames of divine wrath flashing about it, and ready every moment to singe it, and burn it asunder; and you have no interest in any Mediator, and nothing to lay hold of to save yourself, nothing to keep off the flames of wrath, nothing of your own, nothing that you ever have done, nothing that you can do, to induce God to spare you one moment. -- And consider here more particularly,

1. Whose wrath it is: it is the wrath of the infinite God. If it were only the wrath of man, though it were of the most potent prince, it would be comparatively little to be regarded. The wrath of kings is very much dreaded, especially of absolute monarchs, who have the possessions and lives of their subjects wholly in their power, to be disposed of at their mere will. Prov. 20:2. "The fear of a king is as the roaring of a lion: Whoso provoketh him to anger, sinneth against his own soul." The subject that very much enrages an arbitrary prince, is liable to suffer the most extreme torments that human art can invent, or human power can inflict. But the greatest earthly potentates in their greatest majesty and strength, and when clothed in their greatest terrors, are but feeble, despicable worms of the dust, in comparison of the great and almighty Creator and King of heaven and earth. It is but little that they can do, when most enraged, and when they have exerted the utmost of their fury. All the kings of the earth, before God, are as grasshoppers; they are nothing, and less than nothing: both their love and their hatred is to be despised. The wrath of the great King of kings, is as much more terrible than theirs, as his majesty is greater. Luke 12:4,5. "And I say unto you, my friends, Be not afraid of them that kill the body, and after that, have no more that they can do. But I will forewarn you whom you shall fear: fear him, which after he hath killed, hath power to cast into hell: yea, I say unto you, Fear him."

2. It is the fierceness of his wrath that you are exposed to. We often read of the fury of God; as in Isa. 59:18. "According to their deeds, accordingly he will repay fury to his adversaries." So Isa. 66:15. "For behold, the Lord will come with fire, and with his chariots like a whirlwind, to render his anger with fury, and his rebuke with flames of fire." And in many other places. So, Rev. 19:15, we read of "the wine press of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God." The words are exceeding terrible. If it had only been said, "the wrath of God," the words would have implied that which is infinitely dreadful: but it is "the fierceness and wrath of God." The fury of God! the fierceness of Jehovah! Oh, how dreadful that must be! Who can utter or conceive what such expressions carry in them! But it is also "the fierceness and wrath of almighty God." As though there would be a very great manifestation of his almighty power in what the fierceness of his wrath should inflict, as though omnipotence should be as it were enraged, and exerted, as men are wont to exert their strength in the fierceness of their wrath. Oh! then, what will be the consequence! What will become of the poor worms that shall suffer it! Whose hands can be strong? And whose heart can endure? To what a dreadful, inexpressible, inconceivable depth of misery must the poor creature be sunk who shall be the subject of this!

Consider this, you that are here present, that yet remain in an unregenerate state. That God will execute the fierceness of his anger, implies, that he will inflict wrath without any pity. When God beholds the ineffable extremity of your case, and sees your torment to be so fastly disproportioned to your strength, and sees how your poor soul is crushed, and sinks down, as it were, into an infinite gloom; he will have no compassion upon you, he will not forbear the executions of his wrath, or in the least lighten his hand; there shall be no moderation or mercy, nor will God then at all stay his rough wind; he will have no regard to your welfare, nor be at all careful lest you should suffer too much in any other sense, than only that you shall not suffer beyond what strict justice requires. Nothing shall be withheld, because it is so hard for you to bear. Ezek. 8:18. "Therefore will I also deal in fury: mine eye shall not spare, neither will I have pity; and though they cry in mine ears with a loud voice, yet I will not hear them." Now God stands ready to pity you; this is a day of mercy; you may cry now with some encouragement of obtaining mercy. But when once the day of mercy is past, your most lamentable and dolorous cries and shrieks will be in vain; you will be wholly lost and thrown away of God, as to any regard to your welfare. God will have no other use to put you to, but to suffer misery; you shall be continued in being to no other end; for you will be a vessel of wrath fitted to destruction; and there will be no other use of this vessel, but to be filled full of wrath. God will be so far from pitying you when you cry to him, that it is said he will only "laugh and mock," Prov. 1:25,26,&c.

How awful are those words, Isa. 63:3, which are the words of the great God. "I will tread them in mine anger, and will trample them in my fury, and their blood shall be sprinkled upon my garments, and I will stain all my raiment." It is perhaps impossible to conceive of words that carry in them greater manifestations of these three things, viz. contempt, and hatred, and fierceness of indignation. If you cry to God to pity you, he will be so far from pitying you in your doleful case, or showing you the least regard or favour, that instead of that, he will only tread you under foot. And though he will know that you cannot bear the weight of omnipotence treading upon you, yet he will not regard that, but he will crush you under his feet without mercy; he will crush out your blood, and make it fly, and it shall be sprinkled on his garments, so as to stain all his raiment. He will not only hate you, but he will have you in the utmost contempt: no place shall be thought fit for you, but under his feet to be trodden down as the mire of the streets.

3. The misery you are exposed to is that which God will inflict to that end, that he might show what that wrath of Jehovah is. God hath had it on his heart to show to angels and men, both how excellent his love is, and also how terrible his wrath is. Sometimes earthly kings have a mind to show how terrible their wrath is, by the extreme punishments they would execute on those that would provoke them. Nebuchadnezzar, that mighty and haughty monarch of the Chaldean empire, was willing to show his wrath when enraged with Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego; and accordingly gave orders that the burning fiery furnace should be heated seven times hotter than it was before; doubtless, it was raised to the utmost degree of fierceness that human art could raise it. But the great God is also willing to show his wrath, and magnify his awful majesty and mighty power in the extreme sufferings of his enemies. Rom. 9:22. "What if God, willing to show his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much long-suffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction?" And seeing this is his design, and what he has determined, even to show how terrible the unrestrained wrath, the fury and fierceness of Jehovah is, he will do it to effect. There will be something accomplished and brought to pass that will be dreadful with a witness. When the great and angry God hath risen up and executed his awful vengeance on the poor sinner, and the wretch is actually suffering the infinite weight and power of his indignation, then will God call upon the whole universe to behold that awful majesty and mighty power that is to be seen in it. Isa. 33:12-14. "And the people shall be as the burnings of lime, as thorns cut up shall they be burnt in the fire. Hear ye that are far off, what I have done; and ye that are near, acknowledge my might. The sinners in Zion are afraid; fearfulness hath surprised the hypocrites."

Thus it will be with you that are in an unconverted state, if you continue in it; the infinite might, and majesty, and terribleness of the omnipotent God shall be magnified upon you, in the ineffable strength of your torments. You shall be tormented in the presence of the holy angels, and in the presence of the Lamb; and when you shall be in this state of suffering, the glorious inhabitants of heaven shall go forth and look on the awful spectacle, that they may see what the wrath and fierceness of the Almighty is; and when they have seen it, they will fall down and adore that great power and majesty. Isa. 66:23,24. "And it shall come to pass, that from one new moon to another, and from one sabbath to another, shall all flesh come to worship before me, saith the Lord. And they shall go forth and look upon the carcasses of the men that have transgressed against me; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched, and they shall be an abhorring unto all flesh."

4. It is everlasting wrath. It would be dreadful to suffer this fierceness and wrath of Almighty God one moment; but you must suffer it to all eternity. There will be no end to this exquisite horrible misery. When you look forward, you shall see a long for ever, a boundless duration before you, which will swallow up your thoughts, and amaze your soul; and you will absolutely despair of ever having any deliverance, any end, any mitigation, any rest at all. You will know certainly that you must wear out long ages, millions of millions of ages, in wrestling and conflicting with this almighty merciless vengeance; and then when you have so done, when so many ages have actually been spent by you in this manner, you will know that all is but a point to what remains. So that your punishment will indeed be infinite. Oh, who can express what the state of a soul in such circumstances is! All that we can possibly say about it, gives but a very feeble, faint representation of it; it is inexpressible and inconceivable: For "who knows the power of God's anger?"

5. How dreadful is the state of those that are daily and hourly in the danger of this great wrath and infinite misery! But this is the dismal case of every soul in this congregation that has not been born again, however moral and strict, sober and religious, they may otherwise be. Oh that you would consider it, whether you be young or old! There is reason to think, that there are many in this congregation now hearing this discourse, that will actually be the subjects of this very misery to all eternity. We know not who they are, or in what seats they sit, or what thoughts they now have. It may be they are now at ease, and hear all these things without much disturbance, and are now flattering themselves that they are not the persons, promising themselves that they shall escape. If we knew that there was one person, and but one, in the whole congregation, that was to be the subject of this misery, what an awful thing would it be to think of! If we knew who it was, what an awful sight would it be to see such a person! How might all the rest of the congregation lift up a lamentable and bitter cry over him! But, alas! instead of one, how many is it likely will remember this discourse in hell? And it would be a wonder, if some that are now present should not be in hell in a very short time, even before this year is out. And it would be no wonder if some persons, that now sit here, in some seats of this meeting-house, in health, quiet and secure, should be there before tomorrow morning. Those of you that finally continue in a natural condition, that shall keep out of hell longest will be there in a little time! your damnation does not slumber; it will come swiftly, and, in all probability, very suddenly upon many of you. You have reason to wonder that you are not already in hell. It is doubtless the case of some whom you have seen and known, that never deserved hell more than you, and that heretofore appeared as likely to have been now alive as you. Their case is past all hope; they are crying in extreme misery and perfect despair; but here you are in the land of the living and in the house of God, and have an opportunity to obtain salvation. What would not those poor damned hopeless souls give for one day's opportunity such as you now enjoy!

6. And now you have an extraordinary opportunity, a day wherein Christ has thrown the door of mercy wide open, and stands in calling and crying with a loud voice to poor sinners; a day wherein many are flocking to him, and pressing into the kingdom of God. Many are daily coming from the east, west, north and south; many that were very lately in the same miserable condition that you are in, are now in a happy state, with their hearts filled with love to him who has loved them, and washed them from their sins in his own blood, and rejoicing in hope of the glory of God. How awful is it to be left behind at such a day! To see so many others feasting, while you are pining and perishing! To see so many rejoicing and singing for joy of heart, while you have cause to mourn for sorrow of heart, and howl for vexation of spirit! How can you rest one moment in such a condition? Are not your souls as precious as the souls of the people at Suffield, where they are flocking from day to day to Christ?

7. Are there not many here who have lived long in the world, and are not to this day born again? and so are aliens from the commonwealth of Israel, and have done nothing ever since they have lived, but treasure up wrath against the day of wrath? Oh, sirs, your case, in an especial manner, is extremely dangerous. Your guilt and hardness of heart is extremely great. Do you not see how generaity persons of your years are passed over and left, in the present remarkable and wonderful dispensation of God's mercy? You had need to consider yourselves, and awake thoroughly out of sleep. You cannot bear the fierceness and wrath of the infinite God. -- And you, young men, and young women, will you neglect this precious season which you now enjoy, when so many others of your age are renouncing all youthful vanities, and flocking to Christ? You especially have now an extraordinary opportunity; but if you neglect it, it will soon be with you as with those persons who spent all the precious days of youth in sin, and are now come to such a dreadful pass in blindness and hardness. -- And you, children, who are unconverted, do not you know that you are going down to hell, to bear the dreadful wrath of that God, who is now angry with you every day and every night? Will you be content to be the children of the devil, when so many other children in the land are converted, and are become the holy and happy children of the King of kings?

8. And let every one that is yet out of Christ, and hanging over the pit of hell, whether they be old men and women, or middle aged, or young people, or little children, now hearken to the loud calls of God's word and providence. This acceptable year of the Lord, a day of such great favour to some, will doubtless be a day of as remarkable vengeance to others. Men's hearts harden, and their guilt increases apace at such a day as this, if they neglect their souls; and never was there so great danger of such persons being given up to hardness of heart and blindness of mind. God seems now to be hastily gathering in his elect in all parts of the land; and probably the greater part of adult persons that ever shall be saved, will be brought in now in a little time, and that it will be as it was on the great out-pouring of the Spirit upon the Jews in the apostles' days; the election will obtain, and the rest will be blinded. If this should be the case with you, you will eternally curse this day, and will curse the day that ever you was born, to see such a season of the pouring out of God's Spirit, and will wish that you had died and gone to hell before you had seen it. Now undoubtedly it is, as it was in the days of John the Baptist, the axe is in an extraordinary manner laid at the root of the trees, that every tree which brings not forth good fruit, may be hewn down and cast into the fire.

9. Therefore, let every one that is out of Christ, now awake and fly from the wrath to come. The wrath of Almighty God is now undoubtedly hanging over a great part of this congregation. Let every one fly out of Sodom: "Haste and escape for your lives, look not behind you, escape to the mountain, lest you be consumed."


The End


_________________________

i cited in Systematic Theology, Dr. Lewis Chafer, Vol 3, pp 147-153
ii Systematic Theology, Dr. Lewis Chafer, Vol 2, p 362
1 Systematic Theology, Dr. Lewis Chafer, Vol 5, pp 363-65
2 Encarta ® World English Dictionary © & (P) 1998-2005 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.


cc licsense logo

David Coulon 2007-2008


http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/legalcode. Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported. Creative Commons License 2007 by David Coulon. Use with credit.

Thursday, March 20, 2008

"How To Know If You Are A Real Christian" by Johnathan Edwards

by gonzodave


tag: Johnathan Edwards, reformed theology

I include the following from my web searches today. This small, modern English version may be read on-line. A free download has been graciously provided by the author. It is an excellent and fairly short read for the interested person.

In Christ Jesus,
Dave
__________________________

"Originally titled True Grace Distinguished from the Experience of Devils by Jonathan Edwards, 1752. This modern language version is Copyright 1994 by William Carson. Permission is granted for reproduction, so long as this file is not altered, this notice is included in any reproduction, and it is not sold for profit."

puritansermons.com/word/edwards1.zip


________________________________

Tuesday, March 18, 2008

Salvation By Grace Through Faith May Not Be Lost or Given Back to Jesus

by gonzodave


tag: marriage

The following is the AFTERWORD to my unpublished trilogy - God Save Me From Your Followers! or: the gonzo journalism of grace.
__________________________________


Maxim: One may not appreciate the priceless antiques in a room filled with modern distractions.

Arminian theology, aside from a more detailed and illuminating discussion, simply stated, says that salvation, once believed and received may be lost and regained, in a revolving door system of salvation. The "Purpose Driven Church" philosophy, "Dake's Annotated Reference Bible," and the salvation offered by a Jehovah Witness - compared to "Charles Ryrie's Study Bible," "The Old Scofield Study Bible," or the ministry of Dallas Theological Seminary and Moody Bible Institute are commonly encountered, every-day examples.

My focus is not on the "person" of what is termed Arminian Christian belief. Rather, the underlying basis of a contemporary Soteriology (the biblical teaching or doctrine of salvation), or the value of the death of Christ in salvation, is the object of my exposition. The evaluation of the sacrifice made by Christ shapes and underlies a gospel presentation. Quite the reverse of a widely preached and personally accepted Lordship gospel is the believing and receiving of salvation through a divinely recognized and accepted trust that one is forgiven and saved eternally.

Whereas, it may be easily grasped in a "Lordship " gospel that the responsibility of a self-maintained "parolee" salvation rests upon the individual - not Christ. The more difficult gospel claim is that salvation becomes final during one living moment. That is to say, forgiveness and destiny is not determined after death. When confronted with this dichotomy in Christian salvation, the sincere Arminian (e.g., John Wesley and Methodist salvation, etc.) follower of salvation is inclined to respond: I only wish that were true. He sees not a choice, but an impossible wish, like that of human flight.

If a system of so-called Christianity and its gospel is wrong about the value in the death of Christ, that system's evangelical presentations and teachings concerning the believer's salvation and daily walk are quite literally - a waste of time and effort. Likewise, faith in Buddha nor Mohammad, or a great spirit will afford myself or anyone else the certainty of a secure, greatly improved afterlife. Jesus is "all things," (Gk. ta panta), and all things come by Jesus.

I hold forth the magnified differences between the two systems of salvation and advise strongly to avoid the distraction of semi-Pelagian (the heretical "humanistic" teachings of Pelagius, circa 400 A.D., denounced in the letters of Augustine) arguments concerning man's unlimited ability to effect his "free will" in choice and the continuance of salvation. Free will and saving faith are a response, not a cause of salvation. Man did not manifest the conditions of salvation, he merely responds to an offer created by God through the incarnation, death, and resurrection of the Son of God. A Savior who is acting even now to expand and conform His body of believers. Therefore, my prime concern is that the reader may understand what is a proper gospel invitation to God's graceful salvation in Christ Jesus.

In sharp contradiction to Arminian teaching, salvation, like conception, is not a continuing process. Whereas, practice in spiritual maturity, or sanctification, as with natural development and growth, does continue throughout a believer's lifetime.

Naturally developed fruit is not man-made. Fruit requires a tree or a vine. Abundant fruit requires cultivation of the branches. A believer is not the fruit; but the branch. The bloom on the branch fertilizes another by the natural process of bird, wind, or bee. The fruit is of the Spirit and the Light. The fruit is of the tree and holds the potential to produce new branches for new fruit. And the cycle continues.

The original tree or vine, the Alpha, is essential to the fruit, the Omega; but, by natural design the fruit proceeds from the branch. It is God who enjoys the fruits of His labor. But just here a problem arises. Based upon a theory of atonement that rejects the imputation of penalty and worth in the death of Christ which, accordingly - translates into recognition for personal worth - the Arminian fully anticipates entrance into heaven by taking advantage of grace and assuming the greater part of God's enjoyment to be rightfully his.

Saving faith is not a response that can ever be repeated. It might only be improved upon as daily faith is exercised in the belief that one is saved and destined for the glory prepared by Christ. A glory waiting on the souls of those who are vitally joined through His glorified humanity to His divine and ever-existing "fullness," (Gk. pleroma), and felicity of eternal life. The very life in the Godhead shared by the Father and the Spirit of God. Unity with God is a grand and marvelous reality straight from the truthful lips of Jesus in the Gospel of John, chapters 13-17.

Salvation is why God became the Unique God-Man of a new race of women and men possessed of a heavenly destiny. The Arminian doctrine of salvation, where the death of Christ is seen as a "token" death that releases the Father to benignly forgive some sins, is defined by a man-made conception known variously as the Federal, Governmental, or Rectoral theory of atonement may not - because of inherent self-destruction - allow itself the freedom to cherish the real divine motive of salvation. Jesus, the ultimate husband, loves His own "body" so very much. How might He ever deny a truly trusting soul after the two have become one?

2 Cor 11:3 For I am jealous for you with godly jealousy, because I promised you in marriage to one husband, to present you as a pure virgin to Christ. 11:3 But I am afraid that just as the serpent deceived Eve by his treachery, your minds may be led astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ. 11:4 For if someone comes and proclaims another Jesus different from the one we proclaimed, or if you receive a different spirit than the one you received, or a different gospel than the one you accepted, you put up with it well enough! NET


David Coulon 2007
___________________________________

Saturday, March 15, 2008

Abide in Me as I Abide in You

by gonzodave





















God would say to the children of His grace,
To those who possess the power of faith:

Trim your sails and loose your rudder.
Let the breath of my Spirit carry you home.

And the rainbow water flying from your bow,
Is a stream of life in the river of now.

"At that day you shall know
that I'm in my Father,
and you in me,
and I in you.
Because I live,
you will too" 1


1. John 14:19ff, 20ff
2. photo by Steve Ford Elliott, Ireland


David Coulon 2007

Thursday, March 13, 2008

The Spirit of Liberty

by gonzodave



The following is a quote from Associated Press at:
http://ap.com/foi/index.html
________________

The Associated Press is the bastion of the people’s right to know around the world. With a long history of involvement in FOI issues and actions, AP is an industry leader in “open government issues.”

The scope of AP’s efforts worldwide is extraordinary. Whether reporting on Iraqi prisoner abuse or the difficulty in getting aid to tsunami victims, AP captures the consequences of government action or inaction.

At the state level, AP open government efforts are coordinated by the chief of bureau, working in conjunction with state members, FOI councils, industry associations and other interested groups.


"A fight is what this is. We do not sit in some impartial referee's box where open government is concerned. Like it or not, we're in the game for keeps, and we can either play badly or play well."


Associated Press President and CEO Tom Curley, in a 2004 speech, quoted in "Breaking News: How the Associated Press Has Covered War, Peace, and Everything Else," published in June 2007 by Princeton Architectural Press

_________________

My email today to AP:

Subject: Vitally important "historical" international news re: USS Liberty on 06.08.67

Date: 3/13/2008 5:10:30 P.M. Central Daylight Time

Dear AP,
This is critical news. The blog sites are just now getting warmed up to Mr. Phillip Tourney's eyewitness testimony.
Regards,
David Coulon
________________

Here is a copy of my posting earlier today at:

http://koinoniaofgrace.wordpress.com/2008/03/13/the-spirit-of-liberty

Mr. Tourney, above all else, has the liberty to speak openly on the internet.

The Spirit of Liberty

I was so moved by this article, from a man who must be in his mid to late sixties, that I invite you to read his testimony and the many comments and supporting testimonies that have been posted. I salute Mr. “Phillip F. Tourney, Survivor June 8, 1967.” Although, as for myself, I do not consider Jewish conspiracy theories worthy of attention. However, I consider the US servicemen who lost their lives in this incident very much worthy of my attention and respect.

Dave

_______________________________

blog page: USS LIBERTY (please click for the full page)


ONE HUNDRED TWENTY SECONDS FROM NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST

March 12, 2008

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE

“My fellow Americans, I sit here at 3:00 am with my heart racing and my hands shaking and I ask that you please take a moment to read my letter. I ask not that you read it for my sake, but rather for your own and for your children and grandchildren.

JUNE 8, 1967, during the Six Day War, we came as close to a nuclear war than anytime in history and it scares me to death as it should you. For the benefit of those who do not know what happened (the result of a deliberate campaign of cover-up and censorship by a Zionist-owned media in America) I will give you a …”

_________________________________

For more information on the USS Liberty incident please visit: http://www.gtr5.com and for a balanced summary please see http://lewrockwell.com
______________________________

Monday, March 10, 2008

The Scales of Justice

by gonzodave


GOD'S VIEW OF RELIGION


Be careful not to allow anyone to captivate you through an empty, deceitful philosophy [theology] that is according to human traditions and the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ. 1 For if Abraham was declared righteous by the works of the law, he has something to boast about but not before God. For what does the scripture say? "Abraham believed God, and it was credited to him as righteousness." Now to the one who works, his pay is not credited due to grace but due to obligation. But to the one who does not work, but believes in the one who declares the ungodly righteous, his faith is credited as righteousness. 2

THE SCALES OF JUSTICE

A recent poll indicates that a majority of churched Americans hold the belief that heaven is a reward for good deeds. Personal sins and meritorious acts will be weighed on a set of scales by the God of the Bible Himself. This reckoning is considered a determination of one's final destiny. In Western culture this fits the very icon of justice - and blind faith.

I consider the day to day reality of this kind of belief to be a martyrdom. A martyrdom of doubt, or sacrificing for a cause which denies the certain knowledge that you and, those you love, will be together in heaven. On the other hand, a Muslim with a better grasp of his sacred text in Sirah 9:111, has a sure way to heaven. He has a guarantee of salvation when he suicides for Islam. The effect of which he hopes to make heaven his day to day reality. These two views of religion and God maintain widely differing ideas of the eternal state and what is expedient, I admit, but a parallel means of obtaining a heavenly end may be noted - that of what man may do for God.

Further similarities exist between the Muslim who follows radical Islam and the American who follows populist Christianity. The soon-to-be-gone Muslim, true to his teaching, earnestly believes God's reward is carnal pleasure now in exchange for his jihad (a struggle by heart, tongue, hand, or sword to please God and lead a virtuous life. 3). As he is taught, the American, who has only a hope and no assurance of heaven, sincerely believes God will reward him with a measure of health, wealth, and happiness now in exchange for his jihad.

The religious American and the devout Muslim share much in common. Both focus on the here and now. Also, under the threat of expulsion, radical Islam and popular Christianity have expositors who put upon the supplicants a pay-as-you-go duty to give them God's money, as the tithe or zakat. Each religion reveres and maintains the bones of the same dead patriarchs. Mutually, they are a stipulated assortment of communal postures, prayers and ordinances to gain the favor of God. The followers of each believe that the question of heaven is answered by death. At which time a just God is obligated to give them what they deserve. They share in the belief that heaven is a reward.

GOD SAVE ME FROM YOUR FOLLOWERS! From those who pronounce God as a four syllable word; religious garb and rings that need to be kissed; from those who pronounce sin in a high nasal pitch; from those who film themselves screaming your praise and wiping their mouths and foreheads with the same cloth; from greed and the prosperity gospel; from those who film themselves healing in huge sports arenas not hospitals; from killer martyrs and their bombs; from those who film themselves separating the head from the body of an innocent kidnapped victim; from those who pride themselves as your 144,000; and those who accumulate vast records of birth and death in order to conscript and baptize the dead into a non-Christian heaven.

But first and foremost, save the lost from those who, through ignorance or by design, insult Your Son and Your untold grace by following a false hope in religious humanism to teach SALVATION BY CHRIST IS IN CONTINUED FAITH. Only because Your justice was completely satisfied in the blood of Your Son, Jesus Christ, may we believe the Good News that SALVATION IN CHRIST IS FOR FAITH to release us from the law of sin and death.

______________________________________

1 Col 2:8 NET (brackets mine, this writer) NET
2 Rom 4:2-5 (verse omission mine) NET
3 Microsoft Encarta
______________________________________

David Coulon 2007

Amazing Grace - a personal testimony

by gonzodave


The following is an excerpt from an unfinished work. All Bible verses are from The NExT Bible (free to share @bible.org):

... The above verses represent the "good news of Christ" that is intended for those who will join themselves to the will of Our Father and "obey the gospel." The "bad news" with obeying the gospel is that within what is considered orthodox Christianity there is a false gospel that will not save. This is the negative gospel that is presented and argued against within these pages.

Many may certainly disagree, but I have personally experienced what Scripture reveals concerning the fact that the Holy Spirit of God effects the spirit of a man in order to convict him of sin, and righteousness, and judgment. This is necessary because man is blinded by Satan and his world system that we all live in. The matter of man's free will and the divine action of "drawing" upon a man is a given truth in Scripture. Might this divine drawing be removed by another force? This is the relevant question to answer, rather than the limits of free will. 1 Of the four seeds that are sown (Mtw 13:3-9); one is snatched away by "the evil one," one "fell among thorns" and "the care of this world (age)," and two fall on "not much earth" and "good ground." But only "good ground" produces a multiple-fold increase.

I make the following statements with much certainty, as my salvation was not in answering an altar call by Billy Graham at the Astrodome when I was a teenager. Nor at any time in the following years was my salvation a result of attending church or repeating a prayer. However the providence of God works, from childhood I was extremely curious about God and heaven. Having the misfortune of not being exposed to the gospel of the grace of God, I was never satisfied with the limited answers and slogans that I received in response to my questions. I instinctively felt something was wrong with what I was hearing at the time and this - not because I knew what was right. I had a very limited religious background that was Catholic and Methodist. Which is to say, that salvation and heaven was seen as a reward for good behavior. To believe in Christ was to believe in good behavior, not a Savior who would forgive my bad behavior and insure my eventual perfection. My religious background was exclusive of any and all Pentecostal or charismatic interests and associations. That is to say no holy rollers had influenced my spiritual perceptions.

But a miracle occurred, my salvation was secured in private, in one mid-morning moment of personal insight and ownership, when a mental picture of the first Adam, the old man, and the last Adam, the new man Jesus Christ, was juxtaposed against the paternal twins, Esau the older and Jacob the younger. In this image from the OT, Jacob disguised as Esau by his mother, stood in front of his blind father Isaac and received the elder's blessing that originally belonged to Esau. Christ, like the hairy Jacob dressed in concealment by his mother, could not disguise His voice when speaking to His Father.

The mere reciting of this event cannot convey the dynamic of that moment; but, in that moment, I accepted with my whole being that the man Jesus Christ was my Savior God and, not only the gospel of the grace of God was true; but from the very first word to the last, I admitted to myself that the Bible was absolute Truth. A flood of admitted Truth overcame me.

Immediately, thereupon, I began to shake, rattle, and roll with a new love and a fierce desire to be in heaven with Jesus. Soon afterwards I learned this was yielding to the Holy Spirit. This is considered by God to be a "normal" Christian state of being filled by the Holy Spirit. And this, only possible after salvation through the permanent indwelling of the Spirit. It was a manifestation of the Spirit, the ecstasy of divine love - not my own. It was an aspect of the very nature of Christ that I experienced i (John 17:26; Rom 5:5; Gal 5:22).

Rom 5:5 And hope does not disappoint, because the love of God has been poured in our hearts through the Holy Spirit who was given to us.

2 John 1:5 But now I ask you, lady (not as if I were writing a new commandment to you, but the one we have had from the beginning), that we love one another.

"(v. 5) Law (of Christ), Summary: The new "law of Christ" is the divine love, as wrought into the renewed heart by the Holy Spirit (Rom 5:5; Heb 10:16), and outflowing in the energy of the Spirit, unforced and spontaneous, toward the objects of the divine love (2 Cor 5:14-20; 1 Thes 2:7, 8). It is, therefore, "the law of liberty" (James 1:25; 2:12), in contrast with the external law of Moses. Moses' law demands love (Lev 19:18; Deut 6:5; Lk 10:27); Christ's law is love (Rom 5:5; 1 John 4:7, 19, 20), and so takes the place of the external law by fulfilling it (Rom 13:10; Gal 5:14). It is the "law written in the heart" under the New Covenant (Heb 8:8, note)." ii

Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, no one would have looked for a second one.
8:8 But showing its fault, God says to them, "Look, the days are coming, says the Lord, when I will complete a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah.
8:9 "It will not be like the covenant that I made with their fathers, on the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they did not continue in my covenant and I had no regard for them, says the Lord.
8:10 "For this is the covenant that I will establish with the house of Israel after those days, says the Lord. I will put my laws in their minds and I will inscribe them on their hearts. And I will be their God and they will be my people.
8:11 "And there will be no need at all for each one to teach his countryman or each one to teach his brother saying, 'Know the Lord,' since they will all know me, from the least to the greatest.
8:12 "For I will be merciful toward their evil deeds, and their sins I will remember no longer."
8:13 When he speaks of a new covenant, he makes the first obsolete. Now what is growing obsolete and aging is about to disappear.

"(8:8) The New Covenant, Summary: (1) "Better" than the Mosaic Covenant, not morally, but efficaciously (Heb 7:19; Rom 8:3, 4). (2) Established on "better" (i.e. unconditional) promises. In the Mosaic covenant God said, "If ye will" (Ex 19:5); in the New Covenant He says, "I will" (Heb 8:10, 12). (3) Under the Mosaic covenant obedience sprang from fear (Heb 2:2; 12:25-27); under the New from a willing heart and mind (v. 10). (4) The New Covenant secures the personal revelation of the Lord to every believer (v. 11); (5) the complete oblivion of sins (v. 12; Heb 10:17; Cf. Heb 10:3); (6) rests upon an accomplished redemption (Mt 26:27, 28; 1 Cor 11:25; Heb 9:11, 12, 18-23); (7) and secures the perpetuity, future conversion, and blessing of Israel (Jer 31:31-40; see also "Kingdom (O.T.)," and 2 Sam 7:8-17). The New Covenant is the eighth, thus speaking of resurrection and of eternal completeness. (8) The New Covenant rests upon the sacrifice of Christ, and secures the eternal blessedness, under the Abrahamic Covenant (Gal 3:13-29), of all who believe. It is absolutely unconditional, and since no responsibility by it is committed to man, it is final and irreversible."iii

During this divine experience, I had much pent up truth to concede to Christ. This response was particular to me. I had previously studied the Bible in private off and on for years in order to find my own answers about Christianity. I was motivated by my disillusionment with religion and the many differing denominational ideas regarding Christ, salvation, and Christianity. I asked myself, How could so many differing ideas come from what is one fairly short book, the New Testament? In my studies I found that Christ Himself despised religiosity. I also learned the meaning behind "strange fire" and "strange smoke" mentioned in the OT. I found the only curses in the NT are laid on a false gospel, or spiritual sin. I loved the thoughts and realities suggested in the Epistles, especially Galatians and Ephesians, but I avoided the synoptic gospels, as the words of Christ seemed terribly repetitious and out of sync with the rest of the NT.

I then began to read the OT. I now have learned the meaning of "rightly dividing the word." The future earthly kingdom teachings in the synoptics are a different message and primarily are an extension of Old Testament covenantal promises, "Behold, I will send my messenger and he [John the Baptist (Mtw 3:1-3)] shall prepare the way before me [the first advent of Christ when He was rejected by the nation of Israel]: [the second advent of Christ predicted at the end of the events in the seven year tribulation period] and the LORD, whom ye seek, shall suddenly come to his temple, even the messenger of the covenant, whom ye delight in: behold, he shall come, saith the Lord of hosts" (Mal 3:1). Consequently, the gospel of God's grace grounded in the death and resurrection of Christ is contained in the Gospel of John, the Book of Acts of the Holy Spirit, and the Epistles, which are the letters written for Christian instruction in this age. Owing in large part to a destructive "admixture" of the above, I understand also, that the world's negative opinion of religion is mostly correct. Jesus Christ is harmed much in the house of His friends (as during His first advent), but never by His Church, His Bride, and His Body of brethren (His interim work in heaven as our resurrected Savior).

My understanding has grown precept upon precept, and drop by drop, by the power of divine illumination of the Scriptures, provided to me and every child of God by Christ Himself. "Then he opened their minds so they could understand the scriptures" (Luke 24:45). This understanding is administered only as one will yield to the leading of the Holy Spirit that resides in every believer. The benefits thus derived are not intended for the world at large. Any thing that comes "in Christ" and is done "in Christ" is for the benefit of His Body of believers, both current and future.

There are many degrees of effect in different personalities and circumstances. Truth, the person of Jesus Christ, comes to someone in a way that is uniquely suited to them. The presentation of Christ, the true gospel of grace by spoken or written word, and the wholehearted full acceptance of the Truth - are inseparable and vital. The complete acceptance by the mind, will, and emotion in unison is saving faith. The reality of a never to be denied choice.

The theology that adheres to the rationalism which accepts that it is the "inalienable right" of a man or woman, that it is within the power of a true believer to voluntarily forfiet, or "give back" one's salvation is merely a system of Christian profession, not faith. How may a sinner saved by grace completely and forever deny His Savior? How may the Savior "give back" His own gift - the new sons and daughters of God whom the Father has given Him as "brethern" that are to be "created in His image" for all eternity?

The following is an entry from my journal dated October 4, 2004. In retrospect, I believe this was the starting point of a "voluntary desire" that made this writing effort possible:

"I struggle with why God has made life "full of troubles" and why the "precept upon precept" of knowing Him "line upon line" and "drop by drop" - the working out of my love for God - is so constant and immediate. But just now His Spirit in me says, "Your present concerns are a result of free will. The measure of your love for me, the starting point the most difficult point in your life is accomplished. What you will always have after that, which you live with day upon day, is Me working in your life. Note to Self, Let our virtues learn to suffer test."

In closing, I'd like to show you some family photographs from our Book of Life. The Word of God gives us the gospel in a series of beautiful pictures of the silent Truth in the Passion of our Lord Jesus Christ:

Pilate as he was considering the sentencing of our silent Lord asked, "What is truth?" and walked away from Truth. Later, Pilate presented Christ to the Jews and said, "Ecce homo - Behold the man!" Mary, His mother at the foot of His cross. The three hours of Darkness in which Christ suffered the sins of the whole world. The dead pierced body of Christ on His Cross of Crucifixion as the Centurion admits, "Surely, this man was the Son of God." The stone and soldiers that guarded the burial tomb. The empty tomb. The wounds in His resurrected body. The ascension of Christ to heaven after forty days. The witness of the two angels concerning His return.

Truth - Man - A virgin birth - Sinless and unique - The blood of the Lamb for the sins of the world - God Himself - Dead and buried - He's alive and resurrected - Witnessed and confirmed by many - He has ascended and will return.

Christ is in heaven now ministering to His living Church of believers that are placed eternally and securely into His Mystical Body by the baptism of the Holy Spirit. His future return to earth with all the saints who are His brethren is promised. Grace and Truth cannot fail!

"Therefore we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God were making His plea through us. We plead with you on Christ's behalf, "Be reconciled to God!" God made the one who did not know sin to be sin for us, so that in him we would become the righteousness of God." iv

John 17:3 Now this is eternal life 8 that they know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you sent. NET

John 1:17 For the law was given through Moses, but grace and truth came about through Jesus Christ. 1:18 No one has ever seen God. The only one, himself God, who is in closest fellowship with the Father, has made God known. NET

John 10:10 The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come so that they may have life, and may have it abundantly. NET

John 14:6 Jesus replied, "I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. 14:7 If you have known me, you will know my Father too. And from now on you do know him and have seen him." NET

8sn This is eternal life. The author here defines eternal life for the readers, although it is worked into the prayer in such a way that many interpreters do not regard it as another of the author's parenthetical comments. It is not just unending life in the sense of prolonged duration. Rather it is a quality of life, with its quality derived from a relationship with God. Having eternal life is here defined as being in relationship with the Father, the one true God, and Jesus Christ whom the Father sent. Christ (???????, Christ?s) is not characteristically attached to Jesus' name in John's Gospel; it occurs elsewhere primarily as a title and is used with Jesus' name only in 1:17. But that is connected to its use here: The statement here in 17:3 enables us to correlate the statement made in 1:18 of the prologue, that Jesus has fully revealed what God is like, with Jesus' statement in 10:10 that he has come that people might have life, and have it abundantly. These two purposes are really one, according to 17:3, because (abundant) eternal life is defined as knowing (being in relationship with) the Father and the Son. The only way to gain this eternal life, that is, to obtain this knowledge of the Father, is through the Son (cf. 14:6). Although some have pointed to the use of know (???????, gin?sk?) here as evidence of Gnostic influence in the Fourth Gospel, there is a crucial difference: For John this knowledge is not intellectual, but relational. It involves being in relationship.
______________________________________

Footnotes

**Greek fonts do no convert in this .txt file


1 "All that the Father gives Me shall come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will certainly not cast out" (John 6:37). "No one can come to Me unless the Father who sent Me draws him" (John 6:44). In these two verses, spoken in the same passage, Jesus states both sides of the coin with no apology or contradiction. Any can come and not be cast out (free will of man 6:37). All who come have been chosen (sovereign election by God 6:44).
i "There is a very real human love, but all Christian love, according to Scriptures, is distinctly a manifestation of divine love through the human heart. A statement of this is found in Romans 5:5, "because the love of God is shed abroad [lit. gushes forth] in our hearts by [produced, or caused by] the Holy Spirit, which is given unto us." This is not the working of the human affection; it is rather the direct manifestation of the "love of God" passing through the heart of the believer out from the indwelling Spirit. It is the realization of the last petition of the High Priestly prayer of our Lord: "That the love wherewith thou hast loved me may be in them" (John 17:26). It is simply God's love working in and through the believer. It could not be humanly produced, or even successfully imitated and it of necessity, goes out to the objects of divine affection and grace, rather than to the objects of human desire. A human heart cannot produce divine love, but it can experience it. To have a heart that feels the compassion of God is to drink of the wine of heaven. (He that is Spiritual, Dr. Lewis Chafer, p 48)
ii Old Scofield Study System, Dr. C. I. Scofield, p 1326
iii Ibid., p 1297-98
iv 2 Cor 5:20-21 NET


David Coulon 2007

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.